SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Decoupling America’s Artificial Intelligence Capabilities from China Act of 2025’’.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITIONS ON IMPORT AND EXPORT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE OR GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY OR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

(a) PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION.—On and after the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the importation into the United States of artificial intelligence or generative artificial intelligence technology or intellectual property developed or produced in the People’s Republic of China is prohibited.

Currently, China has the best open source models in text, video and music generation.

    • DFX4509B@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      That’s why I consider that tagline, ‘The Land of the Free,’ to be the failed punchline of a bad joke now. It hasn’t meant anything since before Reagan took office at least.

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      People there have chosen that by voting republican. I mean, he told what he planned to do and got voted for anyway…

      Freedom, but only for rich, white douchebags

  • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    It is much worse. I hope I am reading it wrong, but:

    The term ‘‘technology’’ […] includes […] any semiconductor, circuit board, operating system, graphics processing unit, central processing unit, tenor processing unit, field-programmable gate array, random access memory, hard drive, solid-state drive, dataflow architecture, or cloud-computing service, that is manufactured, designed, developed, supplied, deployed, completed, […] [etc.] to function artificial intelligence […] and any other hardware, software, equipment, device, component, robotic computer, processor, network […] that is manufactured, designed, developed, supplied, deployed, […] [etc.] to function artificial intelligence or generative artificial intelligence.

    This would mean that importing and exporting literally any piece of IT equipment, from a Ubuntu installer to a RAM chip, is illegal. Good luck & have fun.

  • BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    This would also effectively ban the use of any research produced by a Chinese national. Any papers which cite the work of Chinese labs (most of them) would be illegal, as this could be interpreted as aiding Chinese AI research.

  • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    Government banned Chinese AI?

    Step 1: ask a friend from any other country to fork the model (brotip: use magnets for faster acquiring a friend)

    Step 2: have your friend rename the AI.

    Step 3: now the model is from said country.

    Step 4: download the model from said fork.

    OpenAI will go bankrupt. US Government will be jelly. Problem?

    • nutsack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      the law isn’t meant to bar you from downloading it. it’s meant to prevent use in a business setting

  • DFX4509B@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    Good luck trying to ban OSS next, which would criminalize basically everyone who’s ever used a browser that isn’t IE, everyone who’s ever used an Android phone or a Chromebook, everyone who’s ever used any modern audio or video codec as the bulk of those are OSS too, and would destroy both Big Data and the Cloud, both of which are primarily Linux-based, and send the US back to the web’s dark ages.

    • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Criminalizing something broadly isn’t usually done with the intention of going after everyone who does it, it’s so when they do single out someone they can charge them even if they haven’t actually caught them doing anything wrong (besides the thing everybody does).

      See also: the way laws about taxes and drugs are often enforced.

    • tiddy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      They’re american, they’d just pick one rich guy to ‘own’ all Foss projects and make it freenium within a year

      • DFX4509B@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        Good luck with that too, especially as GPL3 has a clause specifically forbidding tivoization built into it.

        The type of thing RH is doing with the RHEL EULA in order to attempt to circumvent GPL2 protections? Yeah, that wouldn’t fly under GPL3.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      At least until they decide to Make it illegal for ISPs to allow you to torrent.

      And yes I hear all the people saying can’t, won’t, laws, to which I say those things are all tenuous at best at the moment.

      • wanderingmagus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        Doesn’t a VPN already circumvent this? ISPs already send out copyright violation emails if you torrent the wrong thing, but not if you do it through a VPN.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          From a Sony legal perspective, yes.

          When Big Brother decides to force ISPs to tamp it down, they’ll do stuff like set limits on unidentifiable traffic, set caps just above reasonable streaming levels.

          When there’s no freedom of speech, no right to be innocent, you can tell who’s torrenting, especially if you don’t have to be 100% right to kick them off your network.

  • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    So you can’t download them, you should run them directly on tencent cloud or something? Smart…

  • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Being open weights, if I, resident of Ijustmadeitupista n take it and make a very slight tweak, would it be OK for this rule?

    And, if my pal from China takes a US open model and tweaks it to criticize CCP, will it be banned?

    I honestly think politicians should think just a bit before trying to legislate things they clearly don’t understand.

  • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    I’d like to point out that it is only one single proposal. If this does not get shut down, then it is time to be worried. But for now, it might just be one glue-sniffing Congressperson sniffing the wrong kind of glue one morning.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      It is a single proposal but maybe anybody with an extra terabyte sitting around might want to hold on to a copy

      • mitchty@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        I already have every version downloaded on my nas, more cause I hate redownloading things and am a pack rat.