Anonymous: Trump is making America weaker and we’ll exploit it. The international hacker community is preparing to strike against U.S. infrastructure and calls for public awareness against incoming fascism

  • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    Anything supposedly said by “Anonymous” as a hacker group should always be treated with immense skepticism.

    There do exist somewhat legitimate sub-factions that actually take serious actions and do serious ops, and also semi-legitimate “outlets” for their statements… but there’s also an overwhelming amount of smokescreen bullshit “anon news outlets” and little script kiddies running around. It’s important/intentional that those continue existing as smoke screen for the more “serious” factions.

    Beyond that, being an anonymous group with no real methods of confirming membership to outsiders (insiders can just check if you’re in the private IRCs and etc) it means that just about anyone and everyone can make some big declaration like this. The proof will be in the results, not some announcement that could be made by a rando.


    All that said, there’s convincing and considerable evidence (collected by Krebs) that members of Elon’s DOGE group have background in the actual hacking ops spaces.

    No matter who is really making these threats/warnings, I think things are going to get pretty dire in the US government IT space. It’s been well known for decades that most government orgs have absolutely abysmal cyber security, and now you have a bunch of young adult tech-bros with no true accountability running roughshod over all of it. Then there’s the fact that more than one of them have “serious black hat hacker” backgrounds.

    Going to be one wild ride.

    • reksas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      I guess its pointless to believe their words since there is no way to know if its them. Just look at what they actually do and judge based on that.

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      little script kiddies running around

      Yeah, they’re running around the Treasury Dept right now.

      It’s been well known for decades that most government orgs have absolutely abysmal cyber security

      Having worked with government agencies and a lot of large private organizations the thing that keeps them mostly secure is the amount of red tape involved with things. Patching a production system requires a teleconference with at least five different people and no one person knows everything.

      The idiots without any security experience coming in to “streamline” things will just make the systems even more fragile and insecure.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      It’s been well known for decades that most government orgs

      I’ve seen Muni and Regional gov and also dotcoms.

      The Govs I’ve been at were crazy-tight about security. They were unionized and could decide based on conscience vs costs. Dotcoms, though, followed a different trending, one that really focused on costs.

    • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      I don’t know about government overall, but the military and HHS have has some of the most stringent security stances I’ve encountered. To the point where just working for them was a massive chore. (How effective they were I guess I don’t know, but working for them sucked.)

      That said, I’ll take what you said on faith, because I think you’re spot on with everything else.

      • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        That said, I’ll take what you said on faith, because I think you’re spot on with everything else.

        I mean, it’s not a secret that governments everywhere run really outdated software (think things like Windows 7 and older) because “it works”, so it really shouldn’t be too surprising.

      • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        I once answered a phone call inside a com closet on base. Military IT was already escorting me. Security came because the cameras in the closet detected the camera on my phone. It’s definitely physically tight security.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        Often, ridiculous and onerous procedural security is hiding massively incompetent actual software security or is used to constrain people from discovering security by obscurity holes. Everything I’ve done in government interfacing as a vendor would seem to confirm this, at least back when I was doing it a few years ago. You’d be hard pressed to convince me it’s changed much since.

      • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        I had to help the SSA implement SAML authentication once and they weren’t even allowed to share their screen so I could see what they were doing. Totally agree that it’s a massive chore.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      Yeah. I’ve only spent a few moments skimming through the linked article but if you were part of a legitimate hacktivism group planning a significant operation why would you publish this statement ?

      It’s really just spooky hyperbole - as though written by an adolescent that want’s to sound scary and powerful.

      I would absolutely love to see hacktivists cause some chaos, and maybe even some real financial harm.

      • shastaxc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        The whole point is to being attention to the rise of fascism. Hacking without releasing a statement like this is just terrorism. Releasing a statement after hacking can make it easier for the govt to cover up, like “no we weren’t hacked, someone in our server room just accidentally tripped over a power cable”

  • Letsdothis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Lol this is hilarious. I don’t know which “anonymous” they spoke to, but it definitely wasn’t the actual subversionist hackers that know how to do shit.

  • absquatulate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    Exploit it you say? Please get in line behind the russians, the chinese snd pretty much all arab countries

  • miscellanii@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    If they actually gave a shit about spreading awareness, they’d find a way to get that video on Fox News, OANN, etc

    • Jestzer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      I don’t know if this is the point you’re making, but IIRC, they are a disorganized group, so anybody can claim to be part of them.

  • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 days ago

    Will it be like when they launched a load of DDoS attacks against Sony, of which the only impact was annoying regular people and doing nothing to the company they were supposedly going after?

      • RedSnt 👓♂️🖥️@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        “Bloody Just Stop Oil protesters blocking the road, preventing me to go to work just so they can spread the message that we’re all going to die! I HAVE A MORTGAGE!”

    • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      They have always been techno-punks: anti-establishment and more style than substance. That being said, if nothing else, they were able to shine a light on shitty people and that’s more than most folks do.

      I wish they were getting into organizations and dumping gigs of documents detailing illegal and anti-consumer/citizen activities, but money and law enforcement really goes after anything with an actually impact that might affect wealth. No one actually gives a shit about a website being down. (Excepting like… Amazon or Google and good fucking luck with that.)

      So it’s like a flaming bag of shit left on a porch. They take care of it and shout “you damn punks!” But if you burn the barn down, every cop in the county will be interrogating everyone they can find until you are caught.

        • CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          Thats because anonymous as people actually think about existed for a few years and all the people that did big shit left or turned fed and since then it has been mostly people using the name to get recognition.

  • HurlingDurling@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Anonymous, if you are going to do it, PLEASE make sure to leave the innocent people alone and go after the rich assholes that are doing this.

    Other than that, here’s my axe, go wild

  • Ozymati@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Can they do something useful like destroy the debt infrastructure and delete all student loans and medical bills?

    • Randelung@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      I’m sure backups and redundancies are “inefficient” since “everything is in the cloud, anyway”.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      A more useful thing would be to do as much damage to Twitter as possible. In fact, why they haven’t attacked Twitter while Musk has been disarming all of its safety protocols is fucking beyond me.

      • Juice@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        Attacking twitter would be more useful than deleting all debt? I mean go wild, take that shit ass site down but if you had a “delete twitter” button and a “delete all debt” button, mashing the second one would make you the greatest hero who ever lived.

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          Debt is monitored/store by many different companies

          Even if you took down all data of x health insurance company it would still exist in other places

          So I would say that it poses a bigger challenge and you would have to do it at roughly the same time

          • Juice@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            Sure. Yeah its very hypothetical and silly. As if the Banks that manage national and international money supplies, since most of their managed assets are debt, haven’t thought of it? So no such button exists, whereas there might be a delete twitter button somewhere or one could be rigged up 👀

        • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          You’re right, What if they publish cheat codes for all Steam games, thus freeing humanity from corporate exploitation???!!!

      • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        mostly they are spending hours scrolling through social media accounts of certain types of people looking for dox materials. that’s really about it

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        “Anonymous” isn’t like a formal group. The entire point is that anyone can say that they are anonymous. So yeah, people talk a lot. You can do whatever you like as anonymous.