• Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    This is so cool. I remember seeing that Europe is working on a massive mega project to build an even bigger reactor for more experiements. Its costing like 75 trillion

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Well, if I lived in the world of American liberals and conservatives I was taught about growing up, the game would be over the moment fusion power became cheap, and everybody would be happy.

      In the real world though? We’ll wait way too long, then get excited when it finally starts to happen, and then right before The Big Day some smooth brained asshole will blow up part of the reactor or fly a plane into the facility or something.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Plastic Straws. Plastic cups. Wrapping indvidual food items in plastic and then putting them in a larger plastic bag which you carry home in an even larger plastic bag.

      • njordomir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        The food has been impregnated with microplastics as well. This machine runs on sugar, but someone put oil in the tank. :-/

        • EndRedStateSubsidies@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          The ironic thing is the human body runs on fat and a huge portion of our illness stems from the insane amount of sugar we consume.

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cST99piL71E&list=PLE8LmUoWei5Qp5Nz7C4FMNs6hGNx7M3Jg&index=2

          Summary: In 1984 our group published the first modern study of the effects of adapting to a low carbohydrate high fat diets on athletic performance. I have spent the next 31 years expanding on this research. In my presentation I will present the results of that research program and conclude with our exciting new evidence for the role of low carbohydrate diets and ketosis in the prevention of whole body inflammation in athletes training daily at very high loads. I will also present evidence to show that elite ultra-endurance athletes have an unexpectedly high capacity to oxidize fat during exercise and so potentially to run at fast paces for prolonged periods without the need to ingest exogenous fuels.

          The 1928 Bellevue Stefansson Experiment McClellan W, et al. JBC 87:651,1930 http://www.jbc.org/content/87/3/651.f… Keto-adaptation Demonstrated Vermont Study Phinney et al JCI 66:1152, 1980

          • njordomir@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            Thanks for sharing. As a frequent cyclist who loves cheese and doesn’t drink soda or eat many sweats, I feel like this will be an interesting read.

    • Baggie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Idk dude, we already have the sun and wind but they hate that stuff too, despite it being very close to free. Hell they’ll probably bitch about fusion causing a surplus of power outside peak loads.

      If it doesn’t perpetuate the broken ways we currently do things it doesn’t give their buddies money, so it’s woke or something else bullshit.

  • meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    France’s 22-minute plasma reaction is a bold stride toward sustainable fusion energy but remains experimental.

    🐱🐱🐱🐱

  • CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Well, I’m still skeptical, but I have far more trust in France’s reporting than Chinese claims.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yeah, just like all that anti-white sentiment towards the US because we elected a president who almost passes for off-white.

        Though I suppose there could be other reasons if we dig deep enough.

      • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        China: Spews blatant and obvious lies about everything that does or does not cast a shadow. Heavily censors any source.

        Some guy: I don’t trust information coming from China.

        China (and shills): That’s sinophobic!!

          • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            I never said “our” Government wouldn’t lie to us (unless you’re Chinese, in which case they definitely will). I just said that the Chinese government constantly lies, which is easily seen by anyone with eyes.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        China had a long history of fraudulent science that they need to dig out of to gain a good reputation.

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Nothing like the very highly reliable pharmaceutical “science” done in the US, amirite?

          Its not like we ever had “science” come from the US that said an extremely powerful opioid wasn’t addictive, amirite?

        • cybersin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Because a shit ton of fraudulent science hasn’t come out of the US or Europe. Nope. No sir.

      • Pika@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        huh, I learned a few new words today

        for others who want to know

        • Jingoism: noun

          1. Extreme Nationalism characterized by a belligerent foreign policy

          2. A bellicose patriotism; aggressive chauvinism; belligerence in international relations

        • Bellicose: adjective

          1. warlike or hostile in manner or temperment

          2. inclined to war or contention

          3. warlike in nature/aggressive;hostile

        • Chauvinism: noun

          1. Militant devotion to and glorification of one’s country; fanatical patriotism.

          2. Prejudiced belief in the superiority of one’s own gender, group, or kind.

          3. Blind and absurd devotion to a fallen leader or an obsolete cause; hence, absurdly vainglorious or exaggerated patriotism.

            • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              You don’t think uncritical and nationalistic dismissal of the “enemy’s” achievements as they must be both strong and weak has a place under “aggressive or exaggerated patriotism?”

              I guess that just makes them a racist then.

              • Tja@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 days ago

                As far as I can tell by their comment history they are American, so I don’t know how is trusting France to be “nationalistic”. Or “patriotic”. Or aggressive, for that matter. Not a hint of militarisitc feeling either.

                I might be racist too, because I don’t trust what comes out of China as much as what comes from France. Or Germany. Or Switzerland. Or Japan. Or south Korea. Or Australia. Or India. Or Kenya. Yes, it must be racism.

                • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 days ago

                  Yes.

                  It must.

                  O R

                  J I N G O I S M, you jackass, because it allows for the inclusion of allies within their nationalist tribalism.

                  Just an FYI, you racist lackwit speaking on topic they couldn’t be bothered to do a surface level reading on:

                  Both tests were done as a part of international collaboration project with the goal of progressing to DEMO:

                  https://www.iter.org/fusion-energy/after-iter

  • Match!!@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    1,337 seconds? That… that number used to mean something, but now i can’t recall what…

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s always thirty years away because every time it gets close to 15 years away they cut the funding in half. Zeno’s Dichotomy in action.

  • DataDisrupter@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    I didn’t see any mention of the output in the article. 22MW injected, but does anyone know if the reaction was actually generating a positive output?

    • Sceptiksky@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Article said 2.6GJ input, 2.6 output so 1Q, but I’m not certain it’s really the case.

      Edit: I can’t find my source back, so it’s likely false

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Sounds like the goal of the test wasn’t to vet ignition power in relation to output. These people are testing the durability of system designs that can maintain a reaction after ignition.

      If this was a car, they wouldn’t be testing the fuel efficiency, they’d be testing how long they could drive before the wheels fell off.

    • sushibowl@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      No magnetic confinement fusion reactor in existence has ever generated a positive output. The current record belongs to JET, with a Q factor of 0.67. This record was set in 1997.

      The biggest reason we haven’t had a record break for a long time is money. The most favourable reaction for fusion is generally a D-T (Deuterium-Tritium) reaction. However, Tritium is incredibly expensive. So, most reactors run the much cheaper D-D reaction, which generates lower output. This is okay because current research reactors are mostly doing research on specific components of an eventual commercial reactor, and are not aiming for highest possible power output.

      The main purpose of WEST is to do research on diverter components for ITER. ITER itself is expected to reach Q ≥ 10, but won’t have any energy harvesting components. The goal is to add that to its successor, DEMO.

      Inertial confinement fusion (using lasers) has produced higher records, but they generally exclude the energy used to produce the laser from the calculation. NIF has generated 3.15MJ of fusion output by delivering 2.05MJ of energy to it with a laser, nominally a Q = 1.54. however, creating the laser that delivered the power took about 300MJ.

      • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        The input energy doesnt matter that much. Nobody is going to use 1980s laser tech to power a real reactor. As with OP, inertial confinement is interested in very small nuanced science aspects, not making a power plant.

        • BalderSion@real.lemmy.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          OK, so we should be clear there are broadly two approaches to fusion: magnetic confinement and inertial drive.

          In magnetic confinement a plasma is confined such that it can be driven to sufficient density, temperature and particle confinement time that the thermal collisions allow the fuel to fuse. This is what the OP article is talking about. This Tokamak is demonstrating technologies that if applied to a larger the experiment could probably reach a positive energy output magnetically confined plasma.

          The article you referenced discusses inertial drive experiments, where a driver is directly pushing the fuel together, like gravity in the sun, a fission bomb shockwave in a hydrogen bomb, or converging laser beams in Livermore’s case.

          Livermore’s result is exciting, but has no bearing on the various magnetic confinement approaches to fusion energy.

      • DataDisrupter@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        I wasn’t aware of that distinction about the energy for the laser to generate the heat energy within the reaction not being factored into the Q value, very interesting, thank you! Would that energy for the laser still be required in a “stable reaction” continuously, or would it be something that would “trail off”?

        • BalderSion@real.lemmy.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          In my experience the community will usually distinguished between “scientific Q” and “wall plug Q” when discussing fusion power gain. Scientific is simply the ratio of power in vs power out, whereas wall plug includes all the power required to support scientific Q. Obviously the difference isn’t always clearly delineated or reported when talking to journalists…

        • Womble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Inertial confinement doesnt produce a “stable reaction” it is pulsed by it’s nature, think of it in the same way as a single cylinder internal combustion engine, periodic explosions which are harnessed to do useful work. So no the laser energy is required every single time to detonate the fuel pellet.

          NIF isnt really interested in fusion for power production, it’s a weapons research facility that occasionally puts out puff pieces to make it seem like it has civilian applications.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Good. The only thing that was quite remotely good about the cold war was the competition.

      • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        That’s not what this is, and even then, that competition wasn’t even good. You had two countries hoarding technological advancements for themselves, with everything having to be discovered twice.

        This is a worldwide collaboration, where each assists the others, and it’s a much better way of making progress. See ITER.

        • Akasazh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          I should’ve replaced ‘quite’ with a more clear ‘remotely’ but you’re absolutely correct

    • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      IIRC it was expected because previous record from China was essentially a trial for this one. It all happens under ITER project so it’s not that much of a race.

      • ZJBlank@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Good shit. I’d rather this be a global cooperative effort rather than a jingoistic dick-waving contest.

        • Sceptiksky@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          It’s several cooperative and competitives projects. Diversity is not bad for science anyway. ITER itself involve tons of countries.

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Why don’t we use “shatters world record” like the pro-China articles where they did this for 16 minutes?

    I know why.

    • Sceptiksky@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      No tech will give you a better timeline, back on the floor please ^^ It’s a political problem before anything else, and energy production is far from being the first problem.

      • naught101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Scientists: invents commercial scale fusion Capitalist: hordes the almost free energy because why not? Poor people are only useful as a resource anyway.

    • Obelix@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m sceptical. Even if somebody would present a working fusion reactor today, what would the timeline to replace everything based on fossil fuels even be? Build several thousand of expensive fusion reactors in every country of the world, even in geopolitical rivals like China, Russia or North Korea or war-torn third world countries? Replace every car with an electrical one? Replace home heating everywhere? Rebuild every ship and airplane worldwide?

      • CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Progress is progress, and it’s good to be skeptical (I literally just posted a comment saying “I’m skeptical”!), but progress is good. 🙂 What other alternatives are there?

        If it doesn’t make dollars, it doesn’t make sense. That’s why the electric car movement is having a hard time really taking off rn; it is hard to justify & all the tech, all our builds, aren’t exactly super economical yet. And they’re not built for tough conditions, heavy towing, long commutes, and easily workable & recyclable components.

        …but things are, indeed, getting better. If you look at it from a macro view. Lithium recycling can be done even a decade ago, but IIRC it was relatively small scale & the lithium could be refreshed “most of the way”, not fully. The right things will catch on when their time is right & its viability is realized.

        Man’s greatest strength is our shared knowledge, technology, science, and innovation. I encourage you to make good decisions in your personal life and be positive. 🙂

      • LostWon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        I was just making an abstract sci-fi joke based on how cold fusion has been presented like a Holy Grail in the past. Obviously a better source of energy isn’t going to solve all our problems, no matter how good it is.

      • JayObey711@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        I mean yea that’s the plan. What are the other options? Force every countrie to stop producing instead to reduce carbon emissions that way? Wich one Sounds more realistic? And I feel like you assume that fusion reactors are dangerous because your comments about war torn countries. But it’s not possible to turn them into weapons. They run on hydrogen. And if they ever oberheat or something the magnets stop working and the reaction stops.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        If there were a practical fusion reactor shown today, it’d be 10 years before it could be started to be deployed at commercial scale.

        More to the point, fascism isn’t going away just because we have better electricity sources. Cheap power is a problem in capitalism.

        • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          The EU stopped using increasing amounts of power around 2010 despite continued economic growth (yes, even if you account for imported goods).

          Not that consumerism and the exploitation of the global south aren’t existential tragedies for our species, I’m just pointing out that while capitalism does require never-ending growth, it is interesting to note that it empirically doesn’t require ever-increasing power to do so.

          Fascism is a byproduct of capitalism but unrelated to energy prices. Doesn’t matter if gas is 1€/L or 2€/L when Musk, Murdoch, or Bernard Arnault decide what gets voted, printed and shown on TV.

        • Obelix@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          But pushing for more renewables can also be a way to stop fascism. Those texan oil barons are funding Trump exactly because they want to keep their business. Putin is funding all those right wing parties because he wants to keep selling gas. And the Saudis, Qataris and other dictators are also not to keen on not selling oil and gas.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            Techbros are ready to pick up where the oil barons left off. Finding capitalists to fund fascism is never a problem.

    • Pumpkin Escobar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Or the world blows up and it’s all over. I guess what I’m saying is, no downside, fire it up and let’s see what happens.