• surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Nah. The Lemmy.world mods will ban you for posting or commenting anything that isn’t in line with western propaganda. Fuck merging.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I agree and I think we should merge instances too, and maybe appoint a CEO to take care of it. we can call it lemmit.

  • archchan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I think it would be cool if something like “meta-communities” existed. Fully adjustable, fully optional. Less duplicates.

    You’d sub to one meta c/memes or c/news and see a combined feed of all known instance’s versions. Post to whichever you want, show up in the meta (if you want).

    If you still want to block from the meta sub or individually sub to c/memes on ABC instance, you could do that. Moderation would be subject to the instance the user posted on, subject to broader instance admin’s defederations and stuff.

    Idk just a quick idea. Decentralization is good, but a little bit of… aggregation like this could go a long way without actually centralizing power. Could help communities (big and small niche) to grow.

    • Kichae@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      So, think through how this looks in the long run. Hell, just think about what this prioritizes.

      You have five communities covering the same topic. There’s, what? 500? 1000? 2000 people active in them? Enough that there is a steady stream of posts and comments in all of them. They’re all housed on separate websites, and those websites maybe have different goals and different rules. So, people start lumping them together in aggregate feeds.

      What does that look like? In practice, how do users treat this?

      They treat it as if they’re all one community. As if they’re all in one place. All managed by one cohesive set of rules (or, realistically, most people treat all spaces as if none of them have rules, and then put up a stink when they’re met with the consequences of this).

      Then, they start expecting to not see duplicates. So, which community’s posts do they see when there are multiples? Oh, that’s easy: all of them! They will start expecting comments to be merged. So, now you have people treating all of the communities not only as if they’re interchangeable, but as if they’re all one.

      This is a backdoor to not just homogenization, but to quiet hostile takeovers of smaller communities by larger ones. All because users are too damn entitled to just pick one that most closely meets their needs and contribute to it.

      We don’t need meta-communities. We need people to get over their fucking FOMO.

      • archchan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Not exactly but that’s a good way to think about it in essence. These metacommunities would be purpose built for and integrated into lemmy though, otherwise it would just be RSS which doesn’t address the fragmentation issue.

    • This is a fantastic idea. I really love the decentralization of Lemmy, but I do feel the side effects of having many copies of the same subject on different instances.

      And to your point, I’d love for niche communities to have a larger audience. I need somewhere to post and read about project zomboid.

  • AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    The chronically online weirdos on world don’t like the chronically online weirdos on ml. They are both chronically online weirdos and I try to view these really active communities or names I recognize like a zoo. These people are throwing shit at eachother for our amusement. Keep it separate.

  • pseudo@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Or… And here me out… when can go descentralised ;-)

    Don’t take it wrong. I dislike to check multiples communities just like you but then I remember how centralised my life is and I’m fine with it.

    • dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      yeah, I thought the whole point of lemmy was not to centralize everything … it’s nice when things are spread across separate instances, as long as the instances federate

  • 🅃🅾🅆🅴🄻🅸🄴@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Just chiming to throw some light hearted shade at lemmy.world for defederating from the piracy communities. My time on lemmy.world was really poor, and I came away not thinking too highly of Lemmy as a whole. My experience in different instances has been a world of difference, and I finally get fantastic content in my feeds and am fully on board with Lemmy

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yep, their defederation from piracy comms and moderation of Luigi-related politics are my two biggest gripes with the instance administration itself.

    • NaturalViber@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Which instance are you using? I’ve been using world since start, but open to others. Never really looked into it too much.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Hexbear.net (currently chapo.chat) is good, if you’re a Communist or Anarchist. What kind of interests do you have? Dbzer0 has a bunch of great piracy resources, as an example.

        • Genius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          a Communist or Anarchist

          What a clever way to say anarchists aren’t communists. I’m proud of you, tankie. You guys are always so subtle.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            That’s not what I was implying, historically “Communist” has been used for Marxists. Anarcho-Communism is only one type of Anarchist, there are Anarcho-Syndicalists, Anarcho-Primitivists, etc, meanwhile Marxism is always Communist.

            Anarchists and Marxists do want different end-results, Anarchists want full decentralization and Marxists want full centralization and democratization, but are aligned in opposition to Capitalism and Imperialism and wish to create a more just and equitable society for all.

            • Genius@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              Marxism is always Communist

              Well, if you mean genuine marxists, then yes. But many non-marxist, non-communist groups call themselves marxists, such as Stalinists, who argue for Socialism In One Country against Marx’s advice. You’ve got to look out for those.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 days ago

                Socialism in One Country isn’t against Marx at all. The argument between Socialism in One Country and Permanent Revolution was whether it was worth building up Socialism while also supporting global revolution, or devote all resources to global revolution and give up on Socialism until then. Permanent Revolution ended up being generally wrong, and depended on the Peasantry being incapable of genuine alliance with the Proletariat, which was wrong.

                Genuinely, what do you think Socialism in One Country means to where it goes against Marx? Communism must be global, but Socialism begins with the Proletariat taking control.

        • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Loads of instances do not federate with hexbear.

          Surely it’s only a good instance if you’re happy with a much less federated experience, to say nothing of the usual complaints people have of hexbear users.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            There are some instances that defederated from Hexbear, but largely instances like Lemmy.world. Hexbear is active enough on its own, federation is just a bonus.

            • Genius@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              I’m curious why you said “instances like Lemmy.world”

              https://chapo.chat/post/505181

              Looks like the nice people, the canadians, the LGBT, the trans people, the furries, the new zealanders, the programmers, the germans, and the environmentalists defederated with Hexbear, in terms of instances that have a strong theming. The only common trend I can identify between those groups is that they all tend left of center. Except perhaps the germans, given current events.

              So when you said “instances like Lemmy.world”, did you mean leftists?

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 days ago

                Not at all, I mean generally right-wing liberal instances. Many Leftist or general instances are federated with Hexbear, like Mander or Lemm.ee.

                We could go into the reasons for defederation, if you want.

                • Genius@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Ah, so you mean that many right wing instances are deferated, and ALSO the queers, the trans people, and the furries. Interesting. If both the left and the right are opposed to Hexbear, that would logically suggest Hexbear is centrist.

      • 🅃🅾🅆🅴🄻🅸🄴@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m on lemm.ee! It seems to have a good balance of users and sensible defederation. On mobile, the app you use make a world of a difference too. Both Jerboa and Thunder (Android) were mid tier experiences, but now I’m using Boost and it’s phenomenal!

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        They are just trying to say that you don’t want all your eggs in one basket. In my opinion it’s better to have it posted once on either and it shows up in my list. The logic is that if everyone posts on 1 instance, that instance ends up having more power over other instances. For instance it can defederate with another instance and since all the content is on theirs those users would be forced to start over, or join the bigger instance and abide by their rules. Slowly you end up back in a situation like reddit. Where maybe they put ads in, and you have to choose ads and active number of users, or no ads and very little content starting fresh. Spreading out content helps combat enshitification if you will.

  • Actionschnils@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Memes under lemmy.ml glorified stalin just shortly ago. My first post calling Stalin a Monster and explaining a little, was just deleted. Afterwards they tried to tell me that all his crimes and crulties were fake news or necessary evils.

    Prett fucked up imho

    • Grapho@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      How much libs whine about fuckin everything except the anglosphere is exactly why I’m glad there’s an ml instance

  • qaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yes, but on which instance? Lemmy.ml is not controversy free and Lemmy.world already hosts like 50% of Lemmy alone. I think the only viable option that everyone could agree on would be another instance, but that would just leave us with 3 communities.

    • irreticent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think the only viable option that everyone could agree on would be another instance, but that would just leave us with 3 communities.

      Relevant XKCD:

    • ekZepp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Exactly. Instead why don’t let grow MORE NICHE communities with specific kind of memes on smaller instances?

      • qaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        The larger communities are easier to find and have more subscribers, people can post to one of the smaller ones, but very few people will see it.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        That happens on active but themed instances like Hexbear, the problem is the drive to replicate a “generalist” instance. The fewer “general” instances the better the niches grow.

        • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          An entire meme instance with no users attatched to it with multiple specific meme communities

          I created dullsters.net just for just one community, it could be more if there were demand for dull content or another dull community wanted to come over, but I don’t have any plans to make it some big thing.

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    It would be tight if there was a local option(What we have now) and a All option that let’s you see all the communities across all federated spaces that share that same name.