• taladar@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Agreed. Just the idea of finally replacing JS with something only to be another of those “dynamic” languages makes me want to puke.

    • SeeFerns@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Asking genuinely as someone who knows not much about this subject, is typescript not already an option? Isn’t it just type safe js that gets interpreted as js?

      • SandLight@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Typescript doesn’t run in browser. It gets translated to js by some build steps. I would also say it’s only mostly type safe. You can kind of trick the system if you don’t know what you’re doing or don’t like your coworkers.

        • lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 hours ago

          No, you can’t if there’s any semblance of a PR review process. Reject until it’s type safe.