• crimsoncobalt@lemmy.world
      0·
      5 months ago

      I believe they were bought by someone and eventually implemented some questionable practices. I don’t remember the exact details, maybe someone else does.

      • Otter@lemmy.caEnglish
        1·
        5 months ago

        I remember reading an update which said that the company went back on most (or all?) the negative changes and it’s ok to use again.

        I didn’t confirm it myself, but that’s part of why the alternatives aren’t seeing as much development now