data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46abe/46abe7080f743337ebfc68e76e9cbb49876d7b5d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8191/f81910ac9a4753fbd2185da08ec97ef474e73cac" alt=""
1·
5 days agoHow accepting is society and school for trans children in South Africa?
How accepting is society and school for trans children in South Africa?
It’s just extra seasoning.
Why did the UK refuse?
It’s an example of one company coercing another to enshittify for revenue. Getty also gets the blame here.
Edit: More examples
I don’t like the normalizing of using “woke” to describe progressives.
Why would China want to sell the lucrative secret TikTok algorithm to the US government?
Oh, how thoughtful.
The iPhone was the first smartphone that hot insanely popular. It launched the app store model that’s now used on every mobile platform including Android. Those apps have gotten hundreds of millions of people out of poverty in India and China who are doing e-commerce and opening small businesses from their phones. That’s food on the table for the working class. They can earn money while looking after their children because they’re not chained to a desktop computer for internet access. People in remote areas can know instantly about natural disasters and the news, educating them and making them active citizens in a democracy.
People across the world can chat with each other for nearly free using messaging and social media apps, and won’t have to send letters or pay extra fees for long-distance calls. The iPhone got more people onto what formerly only Blackberry-owning business executive had.
It’s such a first world thing to belittle the impact of smartphone (an industry which the iPhone shaped tremendously), when it has so much tangible impact, especially to working people.