• socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 hours ago

    All representation is positive. Honestly this just feels of privilege from people who have never had to live in a world where their real identity would get them fired or worse.

    • Lime Buzz (fae/she)@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Not necessarily, these same companies will turn around and fire trans or queer people the moment they come out or allow homo/trans phobia to happen.

      So no, not if it leads to exactly 0 material improvement to people’s actual lives and is just a cynical way to make more money (which 9/10 it is).

    • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 hours ago

      And it is people more like the comrade in this meme than the capitalist wearing a rainbow token who got us here, and there is still work to do.

    • Mirshe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Corporations feeling comfortable enough to support LGBT+ people is a good barometer of how we stand in society as a population.

        • Peppr@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Yes, and while that doesn’t mean things are dandy, that’s still better than the alternative.

      • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        16 hours ago

        To state the unstated, “comfortable” for a corporation is defined as what stakeholders believe will not damage them financially, boycott vs marketing.

        If they think the boycott outweighs the positive sentiment, they don’t print the ad.