“The biggest scam in YouTube history”

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m so, so sick of these comments every time some shady shit is uncovered. “How could no one else see this, you’re all so stupid, I knew from the very first ad!”

    Yes yes, you’re mommy’s special little genius, despite conspicuously absent comments from that time…

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Loads of people are suspicious of coupon schemes. They look dodgy. It’s no wonder that people come along after one of these schemes turns out to actually be a scam to say “see, I knew these things were bad” with the only evidence being that they never subscribed to it

      Their fault is they claim it was this one specifically

    • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      This really does fall under two umbrella cautions. There’s no such thing as a free lunch, and how are they making money? Suspicion was warranted from day one, especially if it was owned by PayPal.

      Now, there are a lot of smart people on the internet who could have tracked all those messages and figured it out, like ultimately happened. I just wish they’d done it sooner.

    • cadekat@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      It wasn’t “uncovered” though. This is their business model. I’ve told every person I know using Honey for years that it’s a shady extension and they should stop using it. Unfortunately I don’t have a huge following to offset Honey’s massive ad spend.

      I’m not calling anyone stupid, but stop treating this like it’s new information. Your browser warned you this might happen when you installed the extension:

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Lol, “access your data” is a little different from “overwrite cookies, now sending all promised creator revenue to Honey”. Also, it found discounts, but stores had full control over over how much, and even if it didn’t give you a discount, it still claimed all referral revenue… Don’t act like that was all obvious, intuitive, and known by you, it wasn’t.

        • cadekat@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          I’m not claiming that it was “intuitive”, just that the browser did tell the user exactly what the add-on was allowed to do. Sure, Chrome and Firefox deserve some blame for not making the warning more explicit/dire, but they did make an attempt. Overwriting cookies and rewriting affiliate links are subsets of “access your data”.

          Also, I’m not claiming that I knew exactly what Honey was doing, just that I suspected it was shady and recommended no one use it.