This just solidifies the idea that we need projects like Servo and Ladybird to succeed.
Not just a colossal misstep by the foundation, but one that doesn’t make any sense. Why in the world would they side with a list of companies that are known to purposefully, shamelessly, and repeatedly invade people’s privacy, and make decisions against the consumer
In what sense are they “siding” with the corporations? If anything, this seems like a step in the right direction, to add some modicum of open governance to the Chromium project in a fashion that is clearly not corpo-dominated.
Also, it’s not like this is the Linux Foundation saying “we only support Chromium”, after all they also run the Servo project.
This just solidifies the idea that we need projects like Servo and Ladybird to succeed.
Not just a colossal misstep by the foundation, but one that doesn’t make any sense. Why in the world would they side with a list of companies that are known to purposefully, shamelessly, and repeatedly invade people’s privacy, and make decisions against the consumer
In what sense are they “siding” with the corporations? If anything, this seems like a step in the right direction, to add some modicum of open governance to the Chromium project in a fashion that is clearly not corpo-dominated.
Also, it’s not like this is the Linux Foundation saying “we only support Chromium”, after all they also run the Servo project.