Virtual desktops are here for a long time, and I never got comfortable with them. One of the main reasons that it takes effort to think and assign different desktops for different workflows/situations, and when you do that - it is still not easy to track in which desktop you are at the moment. Usually you have to look for some little number or highlighted square somewher in the taskbar, which is a distraction.
For a “space” to be identified as particular / different, it should be easily recognizable. A different background or even colour scheme is an obvious solution. But in practice most virtual desktops on Windows and on Linux don’t even have a possibility to have a different backgrounds, not even speaking of other differences. Why?
You must log in or # to comment.
MacOS lets you set different ones for each workspace.
On Linux I use tiling window manger and rarely see my desktop background, but I would be surprised if I couldn’t config it to be different on each space.
You might get surprised - I looked at default KDE, Gnome and docs for a couple WMs. Yet my question is not “how do I get different backgrounds”, but rather, “how come is this the usual thinking”? Why? Are there serious drawbacks technically or from UX perspective that I didnt think of?
Somebody made it this way years ago and there’s not enough demand to warrant the effort to change it. KDE Plasma is 16 years old. GNOME is 25. Some features are so deeply embedded in the spaghetti code that any significant change would result in a cascading break.
If you don’t count KDE before it’s major redesign, then you shouldn’t count GNOME before it’s major redesign too.
