BigFig@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agoThose who live outside Europe. What are things Europeans are not ready to hear.message-squaremessage-square662fedilinkarrow-up1254arrow-down122
arrow-up1232arrow-down1message-squareThose who live outside Europe. What are things Europeans are not ready to hear.BigFig@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square662fedilink
minus-squareportuga@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down4·3 days agoThat’s like saying “no u” Of course it’s incorrect (I think) but now the burden of proof is on you
minus-squareSuperfool@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 days agoI guess it depends how you see it. From my perspective, if someone is going ro make a statement that sounds unlikely, then they should provide proof. “What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence” Hitchens Razor However, I take your point. Obviously it is easily verifiable with a simple Google search
minus-squareportuga@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 days agoSorry, I didn’t explain myself well (although you got it). I didn’t mean the burden is on you, more that you were setting yourself up for a “burden of proof is on you” argument
minus-squareSuperfool@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 days agoAh. Ok. I see how you mean it now. 👍🏼
Factually incorrect.![]()
That’s like saying “no u” Of course it’s incorrect (I think) but now the burden of proof is on you
I guess it depends how you see it.
From my perspective, if someone is going ro make a statement that sounds unlikely, then they should provide proof.
“What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence” Hitchens Razor
However, I take your point.
Obviously it is easily verifiable with a simple Google search
Sorry, I didn’t explain myself well (although you got it). I didn’t mean the burden is on you, more that you were setting yourself up for a “burden of proof is on you” argument
Ah. Ok. I see how you mean it now. 👍🏼