• romamix@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Professional communities with invite-only registration, where invites are only distributed to people with high ratings. Also you can add higher barriers, like a requirement to write a valuable on-topic to get rating above a certain level, regardless of the comment rating level. Basically a self-moderated narrowly focused community with invite only registration.

    • ReadMoreBooks@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      What’s meritable often isn’t popular. By what metric should comments be rated?

      Many will rate high. By what means can the set be further narrowed?

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        I wonder if that is one of the areas where AI might be useful in the future. LLMs could potentially be useful to identify non-trivial statements that are not just a rephrased version of statements that have already been made in other comments.

          • taladar@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Well, as far as I know it nobody has done that yet and current LLMs seem to focus more on general applications than on being efficient for specialized use cases like this.

            • ReadMoreBooks@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              An LLM?

              Edit: Everything is of far less significance relative IRL relationships. The overriding goal of ML analysis model with a subordinated LLM hasn’t been to create a space for the best mental masturbation, instead to better focus subsequent human efforts in organizational recruitment for education and praxis.