Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 3 days agoLDACsh.itjust.worksexternal-linkmessage-square115fedilinkarrow-up1818arrow-down13
arrow-up1815arrow-down1external-linkLDACsh.itjust.worksSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 3 days agomessage-square115fedilink
minus-squarecmnybo@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·2 days agoThat’s what happens when you have a 25 year old protocol and try to maintain backwards compatibility through all of the versions.
minus-squareComment105@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-22 days agoThe world of audio would be more of a mess if Bluetooth was developed scrapped and replaced according to what seems to be your recommendations. I’m glad they did it the way they did. It’s not time for change. Just alternatives for snobs.
That’s what happens when you have a 25 year old protocol and try to maintain backwards compatibility through all of the versions.
The world of audio would be more of a mess if Bluetooth was developed scrapped and replaced according to what seems to be your recommendations. I’m glad they did it the way they did.
It’s not time for change. Just alternatives for snobs.