• rekabis@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Fund a sterilization program for young people who have come to understand the future that humanity is hurtling towards, and who want to avoid bringing a child into such a brutally cruel future.

    Both my niece and nephew have sworn off of children, as they have good educations and have fully understood just how badly humanity is fucking itself over. They’re just trying to find doctors that will do those procedures on people under 30.

    • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      May I suggest advocating for better sexual education and healthcare? This will have a much bigger impact than taking smart and understanding people out of the genepool

      • rekabis@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        A blissfully naïve ideal, considering the rightward shift of almost all governments world-wide. The political right depends vitally on creating an ignorant, illiterate, and uninformed electorate who breed like rabbits… you really think that they will willingly fund education and healthcare of any effective kind?

        Right now, our best bet is to stop pumping out innocents who will only know a life that is brutish, cruel, and (once civilization collapses) short. They may have a decade or three of modern conveniences, but anyone under the age of 30 will likely die long before they would otherwise experience a natural death.

        • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          You’re not getting a perfect solution. And with this foresight not having kids is the responsible thing to do. But no matter how weird some governing bodies might behave, you shouldn’t go silent when the world needs people to push for what they think is right.

          This situation isn’t absolute. There are still people out there who listen, and want better information. People that do care. If you can reach even one person you have a good chance of saving someone else and/or their kids/loved ones from the threats we see before us

    • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Humanity may be fucking itself over, but how does that lead you to conclude that taking yourself out is (part) of a solution?

      • rekabis@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I am not talking about taking yourself out. I’m talking about not adding to what will be a very big problem within the next two to four decades.

        The only reason why we have reached 8 billion is because of industrialized agriculture. Climate change - via chaotic weather - will make agriculture in general impossible. When agriculture at scale ceases to be functional - and the collapse of the AMOC will make one of the bigger impacts in the middle of this century - the ability for humanity to feed more than a billion or two will cease to exist. Humanity will tear its entire infrastructure apart in a desperate bid to live another day. Anyone who wants to subject their children to such horrors is not a person who cares for their children.

        We are already exceeding the “worst-case scenario” that has projected a likely extinction of humanity within this century. Why add innocents to the potential misery and suffering?

          • rekabis@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            No, I refuse to look away from facts and reality. I read the science before the IPCC gets to it and “politically massages” it into useless pablum. I listen to those who actually do climate science as a day job… and most of them have started calling themselves “climate pathologists” and are refusing to bring children into this world, because to intentionally bring children into such a future would be to inflict malicious cruelty onto those children.

            • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’m not saying you’re wrong, our future prospects are indeed quite bleak. I was just a bit surprised it’s being accepted this quick already

    • tomi000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Really good idea. Rid the world of enviromnetally responsible people so climate change is accelerated. Thanks for the counter-argument.