Looking to make a change i think.

  • Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    the whole point of this Fediverse experiment is for things to be distributed

    I strongly disagree with this. This point is that it CAN be distributed, not that it needs to be.

    That’s like saying the whole point of making divorce legal is so that everybody gets divorced. It’s the option that’s the important bit.

    • Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why not go to Discuit and their 194 weekly active users if you want a fully centralized initiative?

      As much as federeation gets criticized on Lemmy (and to be fair, it brings some issues), the numbers still show that Lemmy is the most successful Reddit alternative. By far.

    • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      But if the fediverse isn’t actually distributed, then you don’t actually have the option, right? If 80% of activity is on one server, then that server effectively controls the fediverse, and if you have a problem with their admins or moderators, you don’t have a viable alternative.

      If it’s not actually distributed, the fact that it theoretically could be doesn’t really matter. And this isn’t even mentioning the possibility of a centralized server having technical or legal issues.

      The divorce analogy is not a good one because that’s an individual decision, whereas migrating servers and communities is not something that one individual person can just suddenly choose to do. It requires time, effort, and collective action, so it’s better to be pre-emptively distributed to eliminate that vulnerability in the first place.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        If 80% of activity is on one server, then that server effectively controls the fediverse,

        Is that still true with easy export? It sounds like that server effectively controls the fediverse until it doesn’t.

        • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          What do you mean by easy export? I haven’t been keeping up with recent Lemmy updates because SJW is still running 0.19.5.

          But if that’s some way to transfer your account to another server, that helps a little bit, but the more difficult thing is to migrate the communities to a new server. AFAIK you would have to start the communities from scratch with 0 posts and 0 subscribers, and that takes a long time to build back up.

            • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              19 hours ago

              The difficulty corresponds to the size and activity of the community. With all due respect, that’s an extremely small community, and they’ve still only gotten to around 20% of their original subscriber base. For more active communities, rebuilding the subscribers will be even more difficult. Luckily for us, most communities on Lemmy are relatively small, so transplantation can definitely be done for many of them.

              However, when it comes to major communities, rebuilding the subscribers still isn’t enough, because you lose all of the post and comment history no matter what you do. Major communities (c/memes, c/greentext, c/news, even something like c/eurographicnovels) cannot be quickly rebuilt in such a manner, you inevitably have to start from scratch. They represent the combined effort and activity of many people over many months, in making quality posts, making quality comments, and upvoting and downvoting the content judiciously so that the cream rises to the top. You could recreate them and try to copy all the posts to the new community with a bot in a single day, but that would be a pale imitation of the actual community as it existed over a period of time, because everything would have 0 upvotes and 0 engagement.

              Thanks for the reminder to resubscribe to the new c/sideoftheroad though.

              • Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                19 hours ago

                they’ve still only gotten to around 20% of their original subscriber base.

                Not sure that’s relevant. They used to have 915 active users for the last 6 months on the old one, they just reached 937 for this month on the new one, so I guess most of the people interested moved. Subscribers numbers are inflated as a large number of accounts aren’t active anymore.

                Major communities (c/memes, c/greentext, c/news, even something like c/eurographicnovels) cannot be quickly rebuilt in such a manner, you inevitably have to start from scratch.

                Why not? The main issue with the first version of a community is to get enough people in the same place. Once this is achieved, you can just announce that you are going to move, point to the new community, and then post the new content on the new community.

                It even happens now with !lotrmemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com which was created after some powertripping by the admin of !lotrmemes@midwest.social. In this case, it’s a bit different, as both communities are still open, but the fact that most of the people who posted to the old community switched to the new is enough to give the new community 2.85k monthly active users, while the old one only has 2.72k.

                No need to transfer the old content, give the votes, and all of that. People just want to be where the new content is posted.

                • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  19 hours ago

                  They used to have 915 users for the last 6 months on the old one, they just reached 937 for this month on the new one, so I guess most of the people interested moved.

                  !remindme to check their activity numbers 6 months from now and see how they compare. Hopefully it will be higher but I wouldn’t bet on it.

                  you can just announce that you are going to move, point to the new community, and then post the new content on the new community.

                  That’s the friction point. Most people aren’t as active as you are and tend to miss those kinds of announcements. Or they see an announcement and they scroll right past. That’s where you lose 90% of subscribers.

                  I wasn’t subscribed to the dbzer0 meme community, and I don’t expect it to replace the original one. Without knowing anything about what went down, I think y’all should just keep posting in the original community. But I will reluctantly subscribe for the time being, only because I greatly enjoy my LOTR memes and I don’t want to miss any good ones.

                  I’m not saying it’s impossible, I’m just saying that it’s very disruptive and should only be done as a last resort, because many Lemmy communities are fragile as is, and we don’t have enough activity to fill the communities that already exist. Trying to break off communities and replace communities is a dangerous game, and shouldn’t be encouraged to solve minor problems, but only for major, unavoidable problems. People are going to do what they want no matter what I say, but that’s my advice.

                  • Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    18 hours ago

                    As a side note, !sideoftheroad@lemmy.today are not moving for fun or to avoid power tripping. They are moving because the instance of their old community is closing.

                    So it’s rather nice to see them successfully moving that way, as unfortunately it will probably happen again in the future for other instances

                  • Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    18 hours ago

                    !remindme to check their activity numbers 6 months from now and see how they compare. Hopefully it will be higher but I wouldn’t bet on it.

                    Why do you want to check in 6 months? They moved 3 days ago, up to that point they were still posting on the old one, so the 6 months activity for the old community is all the activity there was. Or am I missing something?

                    Without knowing anything about what went down

                    https://sh.itjust.works/post/29284968?scrollToComments=true

                    You can have a look and assess whether that was “major” enough. But that’s the way activity works on Lemmy: the people posting are free to go to another community whenever they want, and when they leave, the old community usually dies.