• nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Judging people for how those people spend their money.

    Hear me out, poverty and wealth inequality is a systemic societal issue, and just like one person recycling plastic bottles isn’t going to solve pollution or global warming, just like that one person doing charity or whatever isn’t going to solve systemic wealth inequality.

    Tax wealthier people at higher rates, but don’t judge someone for getting a gold toilet after they’ve paid their fair share to society.

    Life is all bullshit and made up anyway, and if someone’s self actualization involves getting a gold toilet, then who am I to say no? Not everyone wants a gold toilet, and no one should try to get one by ruining someone else’s life. If your money is ethically sourced, and you’ve paid your taxes, get two gold toilets, who cares.

    • TwinTusks@bitforged.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I don’t care what rich people do with their money, but when someone who is living month to month continues to buy luxury items way out of their means, that really confuse me.

      • nifty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Why? It’s their life, unless they’re asking you for money or favors, it shouldn’t even be a concern. Maybe they’re nihilist or suicidal, what does any of it matter?

    • ReginaPhalange@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      don’t judge someone for getting a gold toilet after they’ve paid their fair share to society.

      Fair share is a very loosely defined term.
      The legal definition? Influenced by lobbying (ie bribing) the right people , in service for the 1% .