For years, Google Maps has been a go-to tool for millions worldwide, seamlessly integrated into search results for instant access to directions, locations, and more. But if you’ve noticed something missing recently, you’re not imagining things. Due to European Union regulations, Google has been forced to remove its Maps functionality from its search results, marking a significant shift in how we interact with the tech giant’s ecosystem.

  • Pechente@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Im a web dev and I build almost all of my sites without cookie banner unless they’re really required (YouTube embeds, invasive tracking etc) and when I don’t include a banner, people usually think I forgot it.

    It’s a shame that most people think the internet just has to be crap now and every site needs some dark pattern banner to track its users.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      There needs to be a browser that auto blocks all cookies, and all cookie banners. You can whitelist the sites you want. Beyond that, your browser tells all the web “fuck you!”

      • Scrollone@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Firefox + uBlock Origin does that for me. You just need to enable the Annoyances filter.

      • cashew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Brave does mostly a good job with this. Though some cookie banners still slip through, and other functional popups get blocked. Still makea browsing the Web more palatable.

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m unclear why you’re being downvoted for sharing reccomendations. So, because I’ve experienced similiar issues when I DID understand the downvotes, I’ll assume someone downvoted you because Brave isn’t their browser of choice, and they’re sitting at their computer like “NO! NOT BRAVE! WHY DOESN’T EVERYONE USE (insert obscure browser which may actually be a better experience, but only 50 people have ever heard of) INSTEAD??? WHY MUST THEY RECCOMEND THE MAINSTREAM BROWSERS???”

          And then 3pm comes, and it’s time for him to give his sheets to his mommy for the weekly laundry.

          Meanwhile, me, someone who’s used Firefox exclusively since 2004, is thinking “Hmmmm, maybe I SHOULD branch out and try other browsers! I’m sure I could try Brave? I’ll be…BRAVE…enough to try a new browser!”

          And then I give myself a big hearty laugh as I drink a sip of my hot chocolate, and proceed to live the rest of my life not giving a shit why you were downvoted. Oh, also, have an upvote!

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah, you’re not allowed to say anything positive about Brave on Lemmy. Instant downvote. Then downvotes for talking about it being down voted.

            It’s like you said something neutral about AI, if you don’t shit on it, they brigade you down.

            Yes it’s very good at eliminating cookies, it tracks and sells your data, but not as widely as the big guys.

            It’s very good at fingerprint resistance too.

            Firefox with UO, privacy badger is very close to it’s level of perf.

            You can install stuff to block your telemetry in just about any browser, knock out a lot of your tracking but still get tracked by your browser maker, your OS, your ISP…

            But talk about brave, they just get pissy.