• NeilBrü@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yes, he was. I would refine the description as a democratic socialist.

      One can be a “socialist” and still be anti-authoritarian.

      • theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        Demsocs explicitly are not socialist, they just want a welfare state.

        And if course you can be socialist and antiauthoritarian, those are opposites.

            • NeilBrü@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              If we’re talking about economic systems or political parties, socialism can indeed be one “answer to authoritarianism”. It can also be authoritarian, even more than what its members seek to replace.

              • theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 days ago

                Nope, by its definition it’s a dictatorship of the proletariat, it’s not authoritarian to subvert the rich and prevent capital from affecting politics. But given you subscribe to China bad US good, the left wing isn’t really for you.

                • NeilBrü@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 days ago

                  Yes, I don’t consider the CCP to be “left wing”. Where in my original post did I say “US good”? I don’t think you read what I wrote.