• Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        23 hours ago

        It’s a piece of media that’s critical of a fascist regime, and the person who says it’s fake is a .ml

        if they ever answer, it’ll be dismissive about how all western media is biased against china/nk/Russia. That’s as close to an explanation of “why it’s fake” as you’ll get.

        You should always be critical of any media that doesn’t have a concrete source though. I don’t personally know anything about radiofreeasia, so fuck if I know how reliable they are to begin with.

        • TurtleOnASkateboard@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          22 hours ago

          if they ever answer, it’ll be dismissive about how all western media is biased against china/nk/Russia. That’s as close to an explanation of “why it’s fake” as you’ll get.

          Look through the modlog for Removed Comments. The answers kesucay is removing talk about how it’s a CIA-linked org with staff appointed by Washington.

          • kescusay@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            22 hours ago

            And none of them back those claims up. Or actually attack the credibility of the story.

            Now then, are you here to defend Kim Jong Un too?

            • TurtleOnASkateboard@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              21 hours ago

              And none of them back those claims up.

              “those claims” meaning that RFA is linked to US intelligence/politics?

              Are you saying RFA isn’t a branch of US interests? I have never heard anyone make that claim before.

              See 1st paragraph: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Agency_for_Global_Media

              38north.org is a pretty decent source on North Korean news.

              Or actually attack the credibility of the story.

              You have the burden of proof backwards: WHY would anyone believe that “hot dogs are banned in North Korea”. It simply makes no sense. The burden of proof is on the person making the claim.

              There’s no reason to think the story is credible. I’ve searched it and it appears RFA posted it in November, then The Sun picked it up 3 days ago. Then various repeaters.

              • kescusay@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                21 hours ago

                Are you saying RFA isn’t a branch of US interests? I have never heard anyone make that claim before.

                No, I’m saying that their reporting and fact-checking is credible.

                38north.org is a pretty decent source on North Korean news.

                Yes, it certainly appears to be.

                You have the burden of proof backwards: WHY would anyone believe that “hot dogs are banned in North Korea”. It simply makes no sense. The burden of proof is on the person making the claim.

                Because North Korea’s dictatorship has a well-documented history of atrocities and bizarre, freedom-limiting proclamations. Heck, it’s well-known for banning foods that it considers contrary to its culture, such as sushi, and it’s hard to imagine a more western food than hotdogs.

                There’s no reason to think the story is credible. I’ve searched it and it appears RFA posted it in November, then The Sun picked it up 3 days ago. Then various repeaters.

                And RFA is credible.

                • TurtleOnASkateboard@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  a well-documented history of atrocities and bizarre, freedom-limiting proclamations… it’s well-known for banning foods that it considers contrary to its culture, such as sushi

                  “well-documented”… then a link to worldpopulationreview.com without a mention of their source??

                  You are coming across as someone who believes things they read on the internet.

                  People have done a good job in the more upvoted comments of showing you why you’re jumping to conclusions, but you keep doubling down like you have something to prove.

                  Here’s Vice saying many Pyongyang residents love sushi.

                  • kescusay@lemmy.worldM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 hours ago

                    Pyongyang is not North Korea. It’s a Potemkin village designed to present a false image to the rest of the world.

                    And it’s hilarious to accuse me of jumping to conclusions when all I’ve been saying is that RFA is credible and we don’t have a reason to believe they’re lying about this.

                    If we end up with evidence that they’re lying, I’ll happily remove the post.

        • kescusay@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          23 hours ago

          On closer inspection, everyone who claimed it’s fake is from .ml, and they all post to the same anti-western, pro-fascist subs. I think they’re brigading everywhere this story got posted.

          I’ll be banning the lot of them shortly.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Based on what? That you don’t know it?
      https://www.rfa.org/english/

      I don’t see anything particularly wrong with it on the surface.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_Free_Asia

      The service, which provides editorially independent reporting,[6][7][8][9][10][11] has the stated mission of providing accurate and uncensored reporting to countries in Asia that have poor media environments and limited protections for speech and press freedom.

      6 references to the Independent reporting part! Seems pretty OK to me.

      • 𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝙼𝚎𝚘𝚠@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Mediabiasfactcheck is not exactly unbiased themselves.

        They’re self-contradictory in their own assessment here. They find no failed fact checks, yet their accuracy is rated as “High”, not “Very high”. No motivation is provided for this. They also state RFA lists sources, but most articles on North-Korea especially only cite “Residents in the country”, thus not providing anything verifiable. It’s also why most major news outlets don’t use RFA as a source, their stories are not verifiable. It’s mostly sensationalist tabloids like The Sun in this instance that uses them as a source.

        Additionally, Wikipedia does mention some failed fact checks, especially concerning anti-vaccine misinformation. See the article here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_Free_Asia under Controversies.

        RFA is not a particularly credible source for this reason. It’s basically impossible to prove many of their claims, so scepticism is warranted.

        This of course doesn’t detract from the fact that NK is ruled by a nutcase dictator who brutally oppresses his people. But we don’t have to necessarily trust a story with as much credibility as some fanfiction here. This story could well be true, but I don’t want to assume that this is fact based on the nonexistent sourcing.