• DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    By not creating the mass murderers and terrorists in the first place, ideally.

    Beyond that, anarchism usually embraces the idea of the broadly armed society and militias.

    • Montagge@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      My critique of that is that’s how you get tge US in the war of 1812. You don’t want to be the US in the war of 1812.

        • Montagge@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          My critique of your critique of my critique is two part. One you’re not wrong. Two it would require everyone everywhere to agree to no professional armies.

          I guess it’s three parts because the militia based army of the US is the one that invaded Canada first. They were just really, really bad.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            After the British Navy kept enslaving Americans for their war machines!

            BONUS MILITIA SUPERIORITY BONUS ROUND:

            Numerous militias refused to cross into Canadian territory because while they agreed with the stated goals they thought trying to conquer the territory was wrong and not to their actual benefit.

            But you’re right. The citizen militia conceit relies on regular training and broadly popular support, and America was lacking in both. It worked in the classical republics because the society was structured to prioritize it and America was not.