It’s not my job to educate you
Also, if you’re going to correct my misspellings, don’t misspell “what”
Your reply was a nonsequitur as well
Islam is a religion, not a race. It’s a set of ideas. I don’t think attacking the religion is morally wrong, as long as you don’t attack the races that commonly practice it.
I normally agree, but that also doesn’t mean that it’s always wrong. Many problems have multiple factors that encourage them and our economic system defines a lot of modern life. It’s bound to affect a lot of things.
Open your mind
I don’t know how to reapond other than to say that just like, isn’t correct
Saying this doesn’t make the problem go away, it just makes you avoid the problem. Ironically, if you’re a man, this often makes the problem worse for you.
There are more relationships you can have than a girlfriend
Deranged take
I always found that idea so cool for some reason
The most interesting one to me, and the one that makes the most sense, is that changes propagate forward in time at the same speed as everything else, so 1 second per second. Why would causality suddenly decide to go any faster than that? This effectively means that all “alternate timelines” exist on the same timeline, and overwrite each other as they move forward.
You can visualize this by coloring the original timeline red. When you time travel backwards, you arrive at an earlier point on the timeline and it begin overwriting it orange, with the “head” of the orange section expanding into its future, which is previously red. If someone travels into the orange area again, it turns yellow, etc. If the instant where you time travelled backwards to make the orange region gets overwritten, the color of the timeline to the left of the orange region would begin expanding to overwrite it at the same speed as any other change.
This does lead to some interesting things, like two time travel loops that include the same point in time literally slowly corrupting the timeline. One loop, where you travel back, wait until when you left, then travel back again, would cause the future from your departure point to continually be overwritten by each new loop color, sending constant-width “bands” of colored time forward before they’re overwritten by the band from the next loop. Two loops’ bands would almost certainly not be commonly divisible, so you’d eventually end up with “bands” moving forward and within the loop that get smaller and smaller, fragmenting the timeline into colored noise. If you lived on the timeline, though, you wouldn’t notice-- even if you’re in a timeline band that’s only 1 second wide, you move with it, so nothing seems out of the ordinary. But if you travelled back to the same point in time repeatedly to check on it, or could freeze yourself in time and watch the bands pass through your point in time, things would be changing incredibly quickly. This also means that waiting time in the future before travelling backwards in time would let the past have time to be overwritten by a different band, so the same point in time would be different depending on when you left the future. All timeline damage would be repaired (at band-expansion speed) if you could remove all instances of time travel backwards to the offending loops, though.
IRL, the speed of causality depends on your speed, too, and in theory, timeline changes would expand outward at the speed of light. My brain is not big enough to think through all the potential consequences of relativistic weirdness and time travel at once, though. I suspect it would allow for “bands”/fragmentation not only in time but in space as well.
…I haven’t spoken at all today. Huh. Strange
Redstar os is the best os everyone knows it’s the pinnacle of linux engineering
Sent from my spy-software-free mobile device (verified by my government™)
The solution is clear: Don’t use any strings