• Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Except you’re blaming past congresses who absolutely operated inside their constitutional bounds. That is not the same thing because that would make any effective regulatory scheme impossible and give the courts a pass on their blatant corruption.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’m not “blaming” anyone. I’m describing what’s happening. The reason why it’s happening is irrelevant.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Is this you?

        The problem is that it isn’t a law, it’s a regulation.

        … it really is just another example of how various parts of the US government have been ceding or delegating their responsibilities around willy-nilly in ways that weren’t constitutionally intended…

        Because that looks like blame to me, and being just plain wrong.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yes, that’s me, and it’s not blaming. It’s describing the problem. I’m not saying whether these things should be law or regulation or whatever, I’m explaining why these things are being overturned in court.

          I’m really baffled by what the point of this argument is. Are you trying to say that things are working as intended?