• CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yes, there are rich and privileged people with any given skin color. Nonetheless are non-white rich and privileged people by far outnumbered by white rich and privileged and non-white rich and privileged are very often less privileged than their white peers.

    • Makhno@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Nonetheless are non-white rich and privileged people by far outnumbered by white rich and privileged and non-white rich and privileged are very often less privileged than their white peers.

      Super american-centric take, go off wrong-queen

    • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      What I mean to say is that it includes every citizen of a particular 1st world country. The US, for example, has a very wide racial diversity, and every one of them is part of my encountered definition.

      • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Then your definition is dumb. There are a lot of poor people in the US. Just because there are people worse off doesn’t mean your own poors aren’t poor and underprivileged and suffering from it.

        Edit: Your description also even furthers my point, because the globally poorest people are non-whites and they are also outnumbering rich and privileged by a large margin.