“Apple CEO Tim Cook plans to donate $1 million to Donald Trump’s inauguration fund, reports Axios. The donation will be a personal donation directly from Cook rather than a donation from Apple”

I’ll defend Apple as being the least shitty of the big tech giants but I can’t defend this.

  • Schwim Dandy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s less than .05% of his worth. It’s like us dropping pocket change in the Red Cross bucket and he’ll make more than that in profit from changes the bribe paid for from the great cheetoh.

  • fox2263@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    They’re all “donating” the same amount.

    And also this is the largest inaugural fund in history. In comparison to his previous which was $107m this is so far over $150m.

    Considering Bidens and both of Obamas were between $50m and $70m is this not ringing alarm bells with anyone? Or is this something to “look” in to in like 7 years time when no one gives a shit.

    Beggars belief.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    No matter how much money they spend on this party they’re still celebrating putting a convicted con man in the White House - whoopeee! - while the chumps who voted for him say, “What… my meds aren’t covered anymore?”

    Congratulations on flushing your country down a solid gold toilet, “conservatives”.

  • JamesFire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ll defend Apple as being the least shitty of the big tech giants but I can’t defend this.

    Why would you do that though? The only thing I’m aware of that they do even remotely better than anyone else is privacy. But it’s not that much better, and it comes at the cost of gestures at everything else

      • homicidalrobot@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Microsoft didn’t spend multiple decades trying to force their own chargers and ports over universal standards. Not saying any of them are good, but apple is in no way better and has spent years creating contention between consumers. It’s just as likely they sell your tracking data as anyone else, they spend developer time every month making sure their ecosystem is considered better for cultural reasons while being ostensibly worse than competitors for most things. Their phones are generally a year or more behind competitors but they have made-up features that serve no purpose consumers rally around like imessage. They have a tiny sandbox to play in without completely voiding your warranty - Themes instead of real customization. “Blue bubbles”? Are you kidding me? How about allowing any form of tinkering beyond a garden path? How about supporting repair of devices at their actual branded stores? They’re easily up there as one of the worst for consumers at large.

        • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m really not interested in a long, drawn out debate about this, suffice to say that if you think all the things you listed, most of which are your opinion rater than indisputable fact, somehow make Apple worse than Google, Microsoft, or Meta … well let’s just agree to disagree.

    • ratel@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      IDK why people say they have better privacy: They just settled a lawsuit over evesdroping using Siri. I think they probably have less interest than Google in selling data for advertising, mostly likely using it internally for their ecosystem so they probably come across more privacy focused but I assume they snoop just as much as any other big tech company.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        less interest than Google in selling data for advertising

        Google don’t sell data. The data is what makes them valuable, so it wouldn’t make sense. If they did sell data, the other big tech companies would just buy their data to remove their competitive advantage.

        What Google actually sells is your attention. Advertisers can target people based on demographic data, things you like, etc, but the advertiser never sees the data used for targeting.

        You can use Google and Facebook’s Ads Manager sites yourself and see exactly what advertisers see.

        On the other hand, Apple mostly keep their collected data for their own ad network. Yes, they have one - it’s mostly just used for ads for “recommended” apps in the app store, but last I heard, they have plans to expand it.

        • ratel@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah apologies, that’s a good point - thanks for adding more context!

          • dan@upvote.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            No worries - it’s a pretty common misconception that tech companies sell data. I’ve worked on ads systems at big tech companies so I’ve seen some parts of how it works. The companies are very protective of their data as it’s essentially their highest-value asset. Employees can’t see any of your data either - it’s very tightly locked down, with strict ACLs and audit logging.

            Large advertisers generally don’t get any special access either - the tools/apps that large advertisers use are mostly the same as what small advertisers / individuals can see and use.

    • Corgana@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      The only thing I’m aware of that they do even remotely better than anyone else is privacy.

      Where did you hear this? Its my understanding that they are one of the worst when it comes to privacy.

      • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Siri “unintentionally” (because it’s a sentient being right?) recording entire conversations def feels pretty terrible.

    • groet@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      They do better about privacy because they make enough money from their inflated prices and blind brand loyalty where they dont have to become an ad company like google. Google is very good at protecting their users data from third parties, as long as they can still collect all of it.

      Apple (currently) doesn’t collect a lot of data which allows them to design products with security as a primary component instead of as an afterthought

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah but it did do cool shit and pretended to be unique…

        People now see them what they are, another parasite leeching on the working people

  • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Steves wept.

    Between Tom Clancy and Steve Jobs rotational corpse energy reclamation may just save us all.

  • cultsuperstar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Paying his tribute to the king. He’ll have to donate more if he wants to usurp Elon. How much has Zuck donated?