• eleitl@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    A friend of mine has just broken the record of 100 days living under water. He is aiming for 120 days.

  • itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    If your looking for me
    You better check under the sea
    Cause that is where you’ll find me
    Underneath the
    Sealab, Underneath the water
    Sealab, At the bottom of the sea.

    About 4 years late, but whatever.

        • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 hours ago

          What part of the opening rationale was incomprehensible?

          “With current diving at 150 to 200 meters, you can only get 10 minutes of work completed, followed by 6 hours of decompression. With our underwater habitats we’ll be able to do seven years’ worth of work in 30 days with shorter decompression time. More than 90 percent of the ocean’s biodiversity lives within 200 meters’ depth and at the shorelines, and we only know about 20 percent of it.”

            • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Humans are the ones tooling and retooling these units for specific purposes, which can be done far more efficiently in situ in an underwater habitation. Along with any other human activities that will be occurring, such as immediate study in a dedicated lab facility.

  • ANT_EEY_ANKS@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Ok but why? Why would anybody chose to live confined underwater? If you like airtight containers so much just build a bunker

    • Emerald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Why would anybody chose to live confined underwater?

      Why would anyone choose to live confined in space? Idk, but the ISS still exists.

  • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 hours ago

    This is for the oil and gas industry.

    Ain’t nobody paying for an underwater habitat for researchers when all researchers do at depth is take photos and samples, which can be done by an ROV.

    Oil and Gas OTOH need deep see divers to do welding and other maintenance all the time.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Ocean horizons 2.0 I hope.

    Elon is probably the only superhero who could actually go there an show them all! Definitely not just any rich guy could do it.

  • WhatSay@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I’ve been playing lots of Oxygen not Included, so… Yeah good luck, what could go wrong?

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ocean is tough. Tougher than floating cities. Which are more realistic as real habitable environment.

    I vote for Stanford torus stations in various L points.

    Or, naturally, Mars.

    Before that, of course, there are plenty of locations on Earth hard to live in, but not as hard as underwater domes. They should try that.