Looking to make a change i think.

  • kersploosh@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Also, consider going past the first page on FediDB and picking a smaller instance. I’m not knocking the big instances (I volunteer my time to two of the biggest, after all). It’s just that the whole point of this Fediverse experiment is for things to be distributed. Going by the numbers on FediDB, fully half of all monthly active Lemmy users are concentrated on the three largest instances.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      the whole point of this Fediverse experiment is for things to be distributed

      I strongly disagree with this. This point is that it CAN be distributed, not that it needs to be.

      That’s like saying the whole point of making divorce legal is so that everybody gets divorced. It’s the option that’s the important bit.

      • Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Why not go to Discuit and their 194 weekly active users if you want a fully centralized initiative?

        As much as federeation gets criticized on Lemmy (and to be fair, it brings some issues), the numbers still show that Lemmy is the most successful Reddit alternative. By far.

      • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        But if the fediverse isn’t actually distributed, then you don’t actually have the option, right? If 80% of activity is on one server, then that server effectively controls the fediverse, and if you have a problem with their admins or moderators, you don’t have a viable alternative.

        If it’s not actually distributed, the fact that it theoretically could be doesn’t really matter. And this isn’t even mentioning the possibility of a centralized server having technical or legal issues.

        The divorce analogy is not a good one because that’s an individual decision, whereas migrating servers and communities is not something that one individual person can just suddenly choose to do. It requires time, effort, and collective action, so it’s better to be pre-emptively distributed to eliminate that vulnerability in the first place.

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          If 80% of activity is on one server, then that server effectively controls the fediverse,

          Is that still true with easy export? It sounds like that server effectively controls the fediverse until it doesn’t.

          • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            What do you mean by easy export? I haven’t been keeping up with recent Lemmy updates because SJW is still running 0.19.5.

            But if that’s some way to transfer your account to another server, that helps a little bit, but the more difficult thing is to migrate the communities to a new server. AFAIK you would have to start the communities from scratch with 0 posts and 0 subscribers, and that takes a long time to build back up.