Facebook are going to do what Facebook are going to do, therefore we can’t criticize what they do?

“fairly good” or not, the question is, is it better than a 3rd party service like the one Meta was using.

but their users will probably be better at putting accurate information than they are.

“they” (Meta) was not the one fact-checking, it was a 3rd party service. And I don’t know why you assume a social media user base would be better at it, especially with highly politicized things like climate change, vaccines, wars, etc.

but broad consensus does not mean true.

to me this just sounds like social media passing the buck to their users with no regard for accuracy. sure, whatever you guys want to believe, go for it.

why is that? genuine question, don’t use twitter.

Just wait til you hear about “Dell Pro Max Plus”.

the top tier names are fine I guess, but all the sub tier names are too much.

far out.

it’s not an issue if you use your own peripherals. I never use my LG’s WebOS and never see any ads.

the parts are mostly already there anyway for image processing, perhaps upgraded slightly. I doubt it’s a significant cost.

agreed. online tracking is so good it just seems like they’re listening to you.

externalizing costs. vehicle maintenance, insurance, wages… it’s all a ruse to get anyone else to pay their overheads without realizing it.

it’s okay you can say fuck.