• don@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 day ago

    [Community note: Mark Zuckerberg died due to having his bowel perforated during sexual relations with a horse. The rest, however, is fact.]

  • casmael@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    164
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    So sad to hear mark has passed away so soon after his rat-penis transplant.

  • Aganim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    In other news, Elon Musk was rushed to the hospital today because of ‘a foreign object being lodged in his rectum’. A reliable source mentioned that the billionaire slipped and fell on an unfortunately placed basket of potatoes.

    An attending physician anonymously commented that the object proved difficult to remove as ‘the patient was extremely uptight’.

    Further information will be shared as it becomes available.

  • dx1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I don’t want them to be the arbiters of truth, but they do need to fix their algorithms to not blow up every single bullshit piece of right-wing hysteria.

    There is a fundamentally political aspect to how social media algorithms promote posts. They need to be designed to be impartial and promote thorough examination of facts instead of “controversy”.

    • dmention7@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The problem is these fucks want to have their cake and eat it too.

      They want to hold a monopoly on online social interactions, which also means having a monopoly on dissemination and propagation of information. But they are simultaneously doing their damndest to avoid the social responsibility that comes with that power and control. (Fixing their algorithm means reducing engagement, therefore the line goes up less) And they are succeeding because all of our regulations around this type of thing are focused on the legacy model of print and broadcast media.

      It’s the same thing that companies like Uber have been successfully doing: Carve out and control an important public service (on-demand personal transportation, in Uber’s case) and then shrug off the social responsibility by claiming that the regulations and protections that applied to the legacy model don’t apply to you for [waves hands in the air] some reason.

      • dx1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        You phrase it like abdication of responsibilities, I think both cases (Facebook and Uber) are actively malevolent.

        • dmention7@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I don’t fully agree-- mainly because I see these actions coming from a desire to hoard money and power above all else. What we perceive as malevolence is just them literally not giving a shit.

          It’s pretty much that Mad Men quote:

          I feel bad for you.

          I dont think about you at all.

          Except replace “I feel bad for you” with “I think you’re evil”

          It matters at some level because the way you go after sociopathic greed is different from.the way you go after true desire to harm. But is there a net difference for you and me…? Yeah not really.

          • dx1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            When they make the conscious decision to do the thing that’s worse for their users because it makes them more money, that’s malevolence. Business decisions of that scale rarely happen by accident.

  • Naia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’d say we should churn out AI slop ourselves that says all these CEOs are dying from autoeroticasphyxia, but we know they wouldn’t actually apply their rules equally.

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Careful with your satire, folks. He’s got money, and people with money tend to be pretty quick on the “defamation lawsuit” trigger.

    Edit: I’m not saying don’t. Please do. But be careful about what you say, and where you post it; and probably stay as anonymous as you can when/if you do.

    • The_v@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 day ago

      Satire against a public figure has historically been ruled as free speech.

      Until the corrupt billionaires pay the corrupt assholes on the supreme court enough to overturn it of course.

        • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          If there’s one thing that’s been clear is that businesses have more rights than humans so we should all register an S Corp in some state that has super lax reporting laws and then post as CEOs of that company.

          If they take you to court tell them that you have limited liability as an officer of a corporation and that they need to sue the corporation.

          Since the corporation has no assets and no income, you start bankruptcy proceedings. Set up a second company and repeat.

            • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              my attorney friend (note: We did not establish privilege) said pretty much the same thing. It’s a lot easier to dismiss liability for an officer of a corporation than for an individual person.

              We shit talked very informally and pretty much came to the conclusion that so long as you don’t pierce the corporate veil (e.g. spending company money on personal things), you are pretty protected.

                • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  This was a few years ago. Pretty much most of the red flyover states (Arkansas, Minnesota, etc.)

                  Basically my criteria was:

                  • very low or free filing
                  • reporting requirements that can be filed online
                  • had strong liability protections

                  Most states (even blue states) have pretty strong liability protections so long as you write your bylaws correctly.

                  But free filing was rare. Most had some sort of annual business license fee.

        • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Well, my bank account is in the positive too.

          My shoes are worn down and rain is an actual health hazard now because I’ve nearly slipped half a dozen times in the last week alone and impaired balance makes that a stochastic time bomb, but at least I can still pay the incoming medical bills. Hopefully. Or at least the first installment.

          But hey, positive balance! I’m sure that won’t trick my impulse buying problem into telling itself I can afford- ooh look, there’s a shiny new game!

    • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Don’t take anything in this as true, it’s Menlo Park, ca

      Edit: actually that’s meta, I’m not clear whether fb has a separate hq

  • Aqarius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Weird, I could’ve sworn this exact same joke about Musk when he bought twitter and did the same.