• Toldry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    I’m still trying to find a good beard trimmer and electric toothbrush that charge with USB-C.

    These are the only gadgets i have left that aren’t charged with USB-C.

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Usually what’s called simpler as opposed to techy ways makes things, in fact, loads of crap more complex.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Huh? That’s not at all how it would be in this instance. They’re updating branding guidelines within an existing standard, not creating a new standard.

    • recursive_recursion they/them@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      It’s actually different and better in that the previous naming scheme was actually horrendous (trying to explain it to customers was a nightmare).

      Cause previously if you wanted to figure out what speed of USB port you were getting you’d have to look up the table because me telling you that a port was USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 doesn’t tell you jack shit.

      Can you see how cursed this is for non-tech savvy people? Absolutely terrible.

      Thankfully now the new naming scheme will be:
      USB +

      • 5 Gbps
      • 10 Gbps
      • 20 Gbps
      • 40 Gbps

      So the xkcd meme actually isn’t relevant here.

      • kameecoding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Techies have a hard time understanding that just because you can look up some speeds easily doesn’t mean jack shit for regular joe trying to buy an usb-c cable.

        Having data speed and wattage indicated on the cable is important, but for most people simply the data speed is enough.

        • essteeyou@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          I can’t remember the last time I cared about data speed for a USB cable, but charging speed is useful when I’m charging my phone before leaving the house.

          • kameecoding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            Once again, you are probably at least somewhat technical and understand wattage, do you think joe schmoe does? Or do they just charge their phone more often?

            • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              Even non-technical people know 80W is more than 10W. They know that Watts usually refers to power usage.

              People have been buying lightbulbs of varying wattages, and understanding it just fine, for many decades now.

              You have it the opposite way around. The average person has a much better grasp of Watts than they do of data speeds in Gigabits per second.

    • Beacon@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      The author was generally correct for most situations, but usb (and especially usb c) truly has replaced a ton of separate connectors with a single standard. And it’s very likely to continue to replace even more as time goes on

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    We’re adding new, different symbols to the confusing mess of old symbols and keeping both? Neat!

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      And whatever you buy is just going to be labeled as the fastest even if it doesn’t actually meet the standard.

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          “Up to” is fine for this, as it’s a measure of capacity. It’s when it’s used as an expected norm like the ISPs do that it becomes more marketing than a rating. The requirement ought to be a known average of realistic usage and not a top end number.

        • daggermoon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          I’m using a printer cable from 2006 to send audio out to my DAC. Sounds pretty fucking good.

          • Knuschberkeks@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            I have connected my printer with a 120€ audiophile cable, and I tell you the prints are just a lot sharper. It gives the text a lot more air , especially around the serifs. Times New Roman looks especiallygood with it.

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              13 days ago

              But does it feel warm? Can you see the texture of those patrices pounding the paper? The natural feeling of primal typographic power, transferred unbiased by our golden cable?

      • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        (“legendary” and “shiny” aren’t actually part of the name but SS+ is and it stands for SuperSpeed+. which is super-a-gacha pull

  • Godnroc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Thank fuck, a simple and clear marking that an average user can understand! I assume displayport compatible ports will still have that symbol, which is fine. Soon I’ll be and to price out laptops that will work with a docking station without needing to read the damn manuals!

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Thank fuck, a simple and clear marking that an average user can understand!

      Next thing you know - all the hardware producers just start using some new standard they’ve collectively conceived. Because “simple and clear” is bad for their business.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Mate, you don’t even need to read the article, you just need to look at the pictures.

      Wattage is part of the branding guidelines.

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Well, it took like 10 years to get this far sooo probably sometime around 2038

      • kitnaht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        We still don’t have Bluetooth with stereo audio and mic channel at the same time… it’s either stereo audio, or mono audio + mic.

        • essteeyou@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          Ah, is that why my headphones sound all weird for a second when a call comes in and the audio hasn’t paused yet?

          Think of the number of times you’ve needed your phone to be waterproof versus the number of times you could have plugged in a decent pair of headphones and not had Bluetooth introduce lag and mono audio.

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Boy howdy, I sure can’t wait for 99.9% of all manufacturers on Earth to completely ignore this as well, and keep selling devices and cables that are completely unlabeled.

    • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Stuff that’s spec compliant has to follow the rules, non-spec compliant stuff can obviously do whatever, so yeah the cheap cables off ebay or amazon won’t use the right logos.

      • A7thStone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        But they’ll still sell you a $180 USB C cable that’s no different than one you can get for $75 and has all of it’s labels.

        • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          Name one Apple cable that has any type of text on it. Or computer for that matter. They do simple. It’s not in their design.

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      That would be USB 2.0 and is pretty safe to assume that all USB ports and cables support this (If you can find a USB 1.0 or 1.1 port I’ll be impressed). Why bother with a 480Mbps logo if it’s the default minimum?