Given how AI is already polluting the water of literary works, I’m likely never going to read a new book for quite some time, but will just pursue books before 2010.

Is 2010 a good cutoff?

  • iii@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    2 days ago

    There have always been bad books. There will always be good books. An arbitrary cutoff would only hurt myself.

    • tetris11@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I feel that bad books written by humans is different than books written by AI, and I feel the difference is mostly intent. A bad book might have been written with the best of intentions. A generated book, not so much

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you find value in the book, it doesn’t matter who wrote it. Now… author reputation is a good metric, if a AI is consistently pumping out good books… then its time to welcome the robot overlords.

        Asking other people you trust for recommendations is a great starting point.

        • tetris11@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, but trusting people on the internet is now becoming harder than ever. Measuring the merit of someone’s words is no longer enough if they’re being paraphrased by some tool with a later intent to either spy on you or sell you products.

          My Convoluted Logic: Sure I could reach out to my network of real people, but not many share the same interests as me. I feel that if someone online who expresses the same tastes as myself does turn out to be an AI, then the minimum amount of damage it could do to me in shilling a book would be one written by a human before the AI was conceived. This is what I mean by a minimum cutoff year

          • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            You could start by switching from strangers to friends.

            Strangers on the internet have always been unreliable. AI just adds to the stench.

            • tetris11@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              You could start by switching from strangers to friends

              count the number of downvotes of this post submission plus my abrasive attitude in this comment and tell me how likely that is to happen

              • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                That just proves my point though

                The down votes are from internet strangers

                I’m an internet stranger

                Friends would presumably be people who share in your interests and outlooks and so would be willing to help you figure such things out. At least mine are.

                • tetris11@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  My friends are good fun people, but our interest overlap is quite small. I’ve historically found myself learning more about my interest from internet strangers, than from irl friends.