• Roopappy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Driving in Manhattan is for truck deliveries and taxis only.

    If you try to drive a car from point to point in Manhattan, you’re an asshole.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Public transportation in the USA sucks shit and it should be improved before unleashing a congestion toll.

      • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Yeah that’s a good point. Also, the congestion pricing could fund improvement to public transport And motivate a change in perspective for the residents.

        Wendover productions did an interesting video on this recently.

  • Kcs8v6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    What I’ve read says that you aren’t charged unless you cross the boundary. If you reside inside the zone and never leave and enter again, you won’t be charged a toll.

  • just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Congestion fees are a very capitalist way of solving it. This law basically exists for everyone except rich people (i,e. Those who can afford to pay fees).

    All this is based on a false assumption that money has an objective value. But in reality, 1$ means different things for different classes.

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yes but the money goes 100% to public transit so it benefits the lower income public transport commuters too.

    • Coriza@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I mean, you are right and the fee should be proportional to wealth, but it is not gonna affect the poor people because they use the public transit. Maybe anywhere else in the US may be true that “even the homeless need/have a car” but NYC would be the exception.

  • boonhet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Love how this is in the one US city where you need a car the least as far as I know. You’ve got the subway, the sidewalks, cabs… I mean sure, the latter exists in the form of ride sharing apps basically everywhere now, but NYC had cabs even in old movies. Though I suspect most other cities of any real size had them as well

    • MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      There are buses too. Last time I visited NYC I used buses all the time. They were clean, frequent, cheap, and I had great conversations with other passengers. 10/10.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I dunno about NYC but Chicago has a pretty large and diverse public transit system.

      That said the first bus I got onto in Chicago clearly hit a parked car that was too far over the line and the driver just sorta shrugged and kept on truckin’.

  • buzz86us@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Awww he might have to go on the big scary subway and desk with the poors… A sad day indeed

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 hours ago

    His kids live on 79th street and he will have to pay congestion price every time he goes to see them.

    So like, what, Christmas and their birthdays?

    • Tobberone@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 hours ago

      That was my first thought as well. Why doesn’t his kids want to live with him?

  • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Dude is complaining because even though he just lives out side of the zone he still has to pay the fee even when he travels north to 79th which is also outside zone. That area is all one way streets and if he wants to go north he has to travel south first into to zone and then he can turn around and drive to 79th. Though I have zero sympathy if you can afford to live right next to Central Park you can afford to pay the fee hunderds of times per week.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I looked on the map. That overlooks Central Park.

    If your home overlooks Central Park, I’m pretty sure you can afford a congestion charge.

  • vortic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I was wondering if there was more to the story. Like, maybe he has a disability and NYC doesn’t have an exemption for disabilities. They do, however, have an exemption for disabilities as well as a reduced rate for low income residents. To me it sounds like this guy is just lazy.

    Looking at this on Google Maps, he can get anywhere on 76th St using one bus or subway ride and a 5-10 minute walk.

    Zero sympathy.

  • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Imagine if we got this sort of coverage whenever someone was inconvenienced by public transit being cut, or a bike lane being blocked, or fares being raised.

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    He gets charged every time he moves his car?

    1. Yes cars cost money to maintain.
    2. Is there a camera pointed at his car or something? Ready to swipe his credit card as soon as anything happens to the car?