✺roguetrick✺

The cabs actually get a surcharge for the congestion pricing but who cares.

I’m not a liberal. Liberal’s prime justification for sticking with the status quo certainly is that they’re “alienated”, though. That’s not the actual reason of course. The actual reason is they’re fat and happy on the current system and don’t want radical change. That’s the benefit of creating pain points, so it’s not so easy to ignore.

You’re the one arguing that direct action should neither be direct or action.

It could, its just hard for the prosecution to handle. Because it’s not direct evidence of the mindset for that incident and it’s inflammatory to the jury the chances of it being ruled as prejudicial and not probative is high. That’s why past criminal convictions are also often excluded from trials.

Not a lawyer, but I think stuff like this is a minefield. The defense would try to get it thrown out as prejudicial and without the suspect testifying all they could do is show a picture to an officer of it who affirms that he saw it on the car and enter it into evidence, but they could only indirectly talk about it in opening and closing because nobody can personally testify about the motivations behind the sticker.

Uncritical acceptance of power structures as natural extensions of humanity. Sometimes this place really is Reddit.

I’m large. Good for blocking entrances and creating uneven terrain. I’m a nurse too, but all that lets me do is tell you “that’s not normal” and “that’s not compatible with life.”

Is it gender affirming to be mansplained by squid?