• volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I’m sorry but calling the USSR a “vanguardist dictatorship” is just not historically accurate. Plenty of democratic mechanisms in the USSR, at any rate much better than anything else we’ve had so far. For a dictatorship, it dissolved itself quite peacefully didn’t it?

    Sadly, attempts at socialism in which workers didn’t take the power of the state, ended up like Salvador Allende in Chile, like Mosaddegh in Iran, like the Spanish Second Republic… Idealism only gets you so far, sadly.

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      While the soviets did ostensibly appear to have democratic structures, the reality was that the democracy was a fascade at best.

      • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Real democratic mechanisms in the USSR: highest unionisation rates in the world, announcement/news boarboards in every workplace administered by the union, free education to the highest level for everyone, free healthcare, guaranteed employment and housing (how do the supposedly “authoritarian leaders” benefit from that?), neighbour commissions legally overviewing the activity and transparency of local administration, neighbour tribunals dealing with most petty crime, millions of members of the party, women’s rights, local ethnicities in different republics having an option to education in their language and widespread availability of reading material and newspapers in their language, lowest rates of wealth inequality in any country, more female engineers in the USSR than in the rest of the world, higher representation of women in the party and in the justice system than anywhere else at the time…

        Please explain me how getting to vote for the less-evil but equally neoliberal party once every 4 years is more democratic than that.

        • realitista@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          First off they were installed in the government by force You could really only vote for one party. And usually the elections were to some degree rigged. And the government that did all the nice things you mention also committed genocides, mass starvation, massively oppressed its people, and finally spent so much on its military that they crashed the economy.

          Not to say western democracy is perfect (the US is especially flawed these days), but there are a good amount of European countries that instituted many socialist policies democratically without that baggage.

          • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            “The government did all the nice things you mention” you don’t get it, that’s not the government doing things, all of those are mechanisms for democracy that barely exist in western countries. You’re basically saying “well yeah those things did exist, but have you considered that you get to vote for republicans/democrats (US) or socialdemocrats/christian-conservatives (EU) every 4 years to decide which of the two parties will apply austerity policy?” You’re not talking about democracy, you’re talking about electoralism, yes we have electoralismo in the west more than they had in the USSR, it’s just that electoralism isn’t democracy.

            committed genocides, mass starvation

            Not true, there’s not one case of genocide committed by the USSR. There was famine in the preindustrial soviet union during the period of land collectivisation, but guess what, there’s famine everywhere in preindustrial societies recurringly, and once the country industrialised, hunger disappeared.

            massively oppressed its people

            Again, revisionism. We are literally living in an era in which the NSA has access to your information in a digital database, and in which the government will happily tell you how they use facial recognition on protests to see who’s protesting. There are literally more people in jail in the USA TODAY than there were in Gulags at the peak of the gulag system.

            spent so much on its military

            The academic consensus is that the USSR constantly tried to put an end to the arms race with the US, at times going as far as unilaterally reducing their nuclear arsenal, which the US never corresponded back. The militaristic empire which forced huge military expenditure in the USSR was none other than the USA, and again, that’s academic consensus. Fucking Zbigniew Brzezinski used to brag about that himself.

            they crashed the economy

            Again, ahistorical bullshit that you’ve never even bothered to look into. The USSR NEVER suffered a crisis after WW2, the only time that there were some problems economically was during the liberalization process in Perestroika, towards the end of the soviet union. It’s the illegal and antidemocratic dismantling of the eastern block its centrally planned economy which drove the economy to the gutter and ended the lives of millions of people through unemployment, lack of basic goods, lack of healthcare, homelessness, alcoholism and suicide. Seriously, do a quick search, look at the historic GDP of the USSR/Russia, and tell me when it falls, before or after 1991.

            Not to say western democracy is perfect

            We are literally funding a genocide in Gaza

            instituted socialist policies without that baggage

            That’s where you’re wrong. It was the existence of the USSR being pioneer in all of those policies, and the struggle of hundreds of thousands of unionised workers in Europe trying to imitate this policy, and the resulting fear of a revolution in western Europe by the elites that made these concessions, that led to this progress. Again, you’re talking ahistorically, as if these advances had been earned electorally in the west.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Plenty of democratic mechanisms in the USSR, at any rate much better than anything else we’ve had so far.

      Fucking lmao

      For a dictatorship, it dissolved itself quite peacefully didn’t it?

      I’m sure you’d say the same about Pinochet, wouldn’t you? :)

      Sadly, attempts at socialism in which workers didn’t take the power of the state, ended up like Salvador Allende in Chile,

      Yes, if only Allende was a dictator, THEN he wouldn’t have trusted Pinochet. That was what planted that seed of trust in Allende’s heart - not being a dictator.

      like Mosaddegh in Iran,

      Ah, yes, when Social Democrats are overthrown by Western powers, they’re good comrades; any other time, they’re social fascists.

      like the Spanish Second Republic

      The same Spanish Second Republic which was backstabbed and destroyed by Soviet-bootlicking MLs?