• ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I usually just go with “this one”; been wrong so far but eventually I’ll get it right.

    • Mickey7@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I wouldn’t worry about that. 20 years ago it was predicted by the “experts” that Miami would be under water a decade ago. Nothing has changed.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Not the real experts, but “experts”. Meanwhile projections by the real experts for lots of other things have been too conservative. But it’s okay, Miami isn’t quite underwater yet. Those king tides though…I wouldn’t live there at this point, the writing is on the wall.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        When I was a kid, they said entire California would end up in the sea within a few years, since it’s on a earthquake fault line.

        That was 1990. :)

        • Mickey7@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          Still don’t understand how people continue to “trust” the people who have a long history of predictions that never occurred. It always reminds me of a guy who pays to get “the special picks” for an NFL game. And for years the special picks guy hasn’t ever won a NFL bet

          • 1984@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            People trust it because scientists make a model. They don’t think about that the model makes many assumptions and if any assumption is wrong, it fails.

  • Elaine@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    My fam has a lot of people who lived well into their eighties. Based on that, I still have a long ways to go.

    • Mickey7@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Even though you have a long way to go do you ever think about something that is predicted in the future but figure you will be dead by then

  • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    On June 2, 2045, I’ll outlive my mother. My father is still alive and in pretty good health. I think I take after him, but I started smoking again recently. I’m tapering off pretty well though and I’m still relatively young.

    • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      That’s an interesting way of looking at it. In 2050 I’ll outlive my dad, but my mom is still alive. I never smoked but my dad did not die of cancer and my mom smoked like a chimney and is still alive.

      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        My mom did die of cancer, but not lung cancer. They both quit when they were younger than I am, but each smoked much more in total than I have, so I think that’s a toss up. Smoking is basically my only unhealthy habit -I don’t even sit very much- but it’s a whopper of an unhealthy habit

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Not really, but whenever a year in the future is mentioned, I do wonder if I’ll be around for it.