Post on Bluesky that says, “please stop suggesting I solve my problem by changing my behavior. I do not want to do that.”

  • proceduralnightshade@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    The writer and group analyst Farhad Dalal questions the socio-political assumptions behind the introduction of CBT. According to one reviewer, Dalal connects the rise of CBT with "the parallel rise of neoliberalism, with its focus on marketization, efficiency, quantification and managerialism, and he questions the scientific basis of CBT, suggesting that “the ‘science’ of psychological treatment is often less a scientific than a political contest”. In his book, Dalal also questions the ethical basis of CBT.

    From the Wikipedia article on CBT – link

    • lurklurk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ironically, that doesn’t sound like a scientific rebuttal of the efficacy of CBT as much as a political argument

    • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m not a fan of CBT. To me it’s just autogaslighting.

      Some of it can be helpful, in some very limited circumstances (like anxiety conditions that remain when the trigger is gone, or insecurity like imposter syndrome), but you can’t fix externally-caused ongoing problems with it, and it certainly doesn’t make you feel at all better to try (quite worse, often, because it’s yet another failure)…

      Yet therapists insist on pushing it for every problem. And they wonder why people don’t have much faith in the mental health system, if they can even access care in the first place…

      • EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I say we double down

        The writer and group analyst Farhad Dalal questions the socio-political assumptions behind the introduction of Cock and Ball Torture. According to one reviewer, Dalal connects the rise of Cock and Ball Torture with "the parallel rise of neoliberalism, with its focus on marketization, efficiency, quantification and managerialism, and he questions the scientific basis of Cock and Ball Torture, suggesting that “the ‘science’ of psychological treatment is often less a scientific than a political contest”. In his book, Dalal also questions the ethical basis of Cock and Ball Torture.