• Nasan@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      I want to say we agreed that the base had to be out of Earth’s orbit. I’d have to go over the details again as we made the wager a long time ago and after several drinks.

      • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Does a moon base count? Technically the moon would have orbital priority but it itself or its the Earth. Does an aldrin cycler count as a base? Does something in an unstable orbit that happens to largely coincide with earths orbit count?

        • Nasan@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          No on the moon base as the Nazis already did it. The base needs to be installed on a terrestrial body other than Earth and its moon. Just to keep things fair since we’re unsure how long it might be before the fabric of time is discovered to require military intervention.

        • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          Base on moon would not be orbiting the earth because the moon does not orbit the earth.

          • Sconrad122@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Wut? The moon definitely does orbit the earth, that’s like its defining feature. Am I whooshing?

              • Womble@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                Thats a meaningless distintion, the moon orbits the earth with an elliptical orbit in the Earth’s frame of reference, or an eliptical orbit with fairly large, low frequency oscillations in the Sun’s frame of reference. The same is true for something in LEO except the oscilations are smaller and shorter period.

                • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  21 hours ago

                  It is a valid distinction

                  Remove the sun and the moon and earth will no longer be together. Either the moon is leaving or crashing into the earth.

                  Remove the sun and the ISS is still going to orbit the earth.

                  If we were driving cars around a race track and kept pass each other on the left, you’d say one of us was “orbiting” the other?

                  • Womble@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    21 hours ago

                    I’m not sure where you got that from, the moon absolutely is gravitationally bound to the earth, so much so that it has become tidally locked.

          • Damage@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Is this the new conspiracy theory to replace flat earth? Go, spread your narrative wings!