• BugKilla@lemmy.world
      0·
      19 hours ago

      Well, yes. You could bury code or malicious data in an image, QR or otherwise, and leverage an exploit that during processing of the visual data within the camera subsystem or inter subsystem calls could hypothetically trigger an execution path that results in a different outcome than expected, all without user permission. There is a lot of sw and hw sec controls in play at internal system boundaries and it would be very very difficult to gain privilege enough to fist fuck a phone but not impossible.

      With the outstanding level of FR, NFR and Sec testing that companies perform these days it is not likely to happen. It’s not like they push out minimal viable products or something, right? /S

  • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
    0·
    1 day ago

    I can’t think of a single phone that automatically opens links that are in QR codes. The worst it would do is just show a link to malware, wish you would have to manually click in order to download the malware.

    • smeg@feddit.ukEnglish
      0·
      12 hours ago

      This was a few years ago (so I hope there have been patches since then) but I watched a video which was trying to make an entire game within a QR code: they don’t have to just be links, they can be binaries that some devices will immediately run without question!

      • themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works
        0·
        11 hours ago

        Quite the opposite. That video by mattkc (iirc) repeatedly and unequivocally says that to make this work, he made his pc save the binary and explicitly run it using a python script, because doing it natively would be fucking insane

  • bleistift2@sopuli.xyzEnglish
    0·
    1 day ago

    I believe this should work. At least some German emergency vehicles now come with filming protection.

    The linked web page reads, “Attention! Rubbernecking kills!”

    • naeap@sopuli.xyz
      0·
      1 day ago

      I’m not sure a pseudo QR code on the truck gives off the right message

      I actually would really like to know, what it says and would make myself punishable by that
      But I think, it looks so inviting to scan it…

      • bleistift2@sopuli.xyzEnglish
        0·
        10 hours ago

        The way I see it there are two options:

        1. You’re in a car and driving past that vehicle. If you don’t have your phone ready already, you won’t get it out in time and won’t be able to scan the code. You didn’t read the code and didn’t need to (because you weren’t rubbernecking).

        2. You’re in a car with your phone already out (because you’re expecting a crash) or you’re a pedestrian who takes out their phone to film the crash site. You do read the code and you should see it, because you’re rubbernecking.

    • littlewonder@lemmy.world
      0·
      1 day ago

      Most do. It’s the only reason they finally somewhat caught on after a rough start when users had to download an app in order to read the code.

    • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
      0·
      1 day ago

      Every smartphone I’ve had does but every one of them has also asked if I want to follow the link rather than just doing it.

        • TheOakTree@lemm.ee
          0·
          9 hours ago

          That’s custom software on custom firmware, which is very extraneous to the average consumer…

          It’s also not a “released” phone in the sense that Google isn’t selling it in that state.

  • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
    0·
    1 day ago

    All fun and games until you open your camera app and it’s in selfie mode, instantly catching the QR code and bricks your own phone.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      0·
      1 day ago

      That makes no sense, cause why would you intentionally click on the link you inadvertently scanned to brick your own phone?