• Godric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I remember starting counter-chants in the student section when redcap shitters would try it at games.

    An instant “shut the fuck uh-up” or “watch the damn gay-aym” quieted them down real quick every time.

    • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      It means ‘fuck Joe biden’, there was some NASCAR thing where people were chanting ‘fuck Joe Biden’. It was being reported on and the reporter relayed it as ‘lets go brandon’ and it became a meme on the right.

      The meme in this thread is about how American conservatives completely miss the nuance of why people on the left actually oppose both them and centrist Democrats. It’s easier to do childish shit and just assume that everyone to their left is some form of liberal who loves Joe Biden. The good news is they’re not getting younger.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Trumpists: “We did it! We won! Trump is President! What’s the first step to Making America Great Again?”

      Elon: “I think we’re going to increase the number of H1-B visas.”

      Vivek: “Definitely more East Asian immigration. That’s what this country needs more than anything.”

      Trump: “Sounds good to me.”

      Trumpists: “… wtf?”

  • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Honestly this is very unimportant. It has no lasting impact, and will be forgotten by most later

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Arguing politics with someone who thinks ‘let’s go Brandon’ is useful argumentation is like arguing religion with someone who never read their holy book or science with someone who barely passed 5th grade, their whole position is as superficial as possible and they think name calling is effective discourse in general because it works on people who are uneducated on the topic and rhetoric like themselves.

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    They started saying it because neolibs were trying to get the red MAGAs banned from communities and platforms for bad language, or just getting the algorithm to suppress it from feeds. Then when they switched, neolibs got pissed the red MAGAs were working around the algorithm filtering, and started posting this stupid meme.

    Watching Red & Blue MAGA bicker is like watching toddlers argue.

    • Cheems@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      No they weren’t no one gives a fuck if you swear. Maga people started saying it because of that news reporter at a nascar* (I believe) event. The crowd was chanting fuck joe Biden and she misheard it and it went viral.

      • ninjabard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        She was interviewing the winning driver, named Brandon, and tried to spin it into a chant for him.

      • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        It went viral because conservatives believe that it’s a great example of how liberals will just make something like this up and run with it because they’re used to using their media dominance to control any narrative in any way they want (reinforcing a narrative started by Limbaugh 37 years ago).

        In reality, this woman really wasn’t paying attention and made a mistake.

        So yet again, conservatives believe what they want to be true. As we all know that’s how reality works, right? So I’m just sitting here waiting to see how and when it breaks down. It’s been almost 10 years now of it absolutely working for them in every possible way. It’s kind of fascinating and unbelievable really that you can get as far as destroying the country completely just on faith and vapors, but here we are.

      • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I really doubt she misheard it, the whole stadium was chanting it, she just couldn’t repeat “fuck joe biden” on the news when they asked what they were chanting.

        • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Naw our brains do that shit all the time - you don’t hear someone quite right, and instead of recognizing that you didn’t get the info, your noggin just fills in the blanks on its own. She very well may have clearly heard “Let’s go Brandon!”

          Perception is reality.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Turn it around on him, mention the deporter-in-chief’s record deportations, that even Trump didn’t beat. All the African and middle-eastern countries the patron saint of drones bombed. All the poor folk the banks gave predatory loans to that he taught personal responsibility to by letting the banks take their homes. Making a speech blaming poor outcomes in black communities on fathers not being in the picture is every racist conservative’s wet dream. It’s much harder for your dad to admit he didn’t like Obama’s policies.

  • Thorry84@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Joe could go out like a real chad if his last words as president are: “It’s Joever”

  • They think that just because you voted for a certain guy, it means you love him. Nope. I probably hate Joe Biden more than most Republicans do. Unlike them, I actually know some of his policies. Some of them are great. And some of them are wretched. But most of them are just business as usual bullshit when what we need is real change.

    • Zess@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Just like when they kept calling Harris a communist. You dumbasses, actual communists fucking hate Kamala Harris.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      I probably hate Joe Biden more than most Republicans do. Unlike them, I actually know some of his policies.

      Every day I get down on my knees and pray to the Sweet Baby Jesus that we get the kind of Far-Left Super-Woke Anti-Imperial Anti-Racist-Baby Red Diaper LGBTQ Sicko Pinko Communist that the average FOX News Republican keep insisting Democrats elected.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Indeed, it’s like “You think you’re owning the libs? Mother fucker my very existence complicates their plans.”

      • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think what he meant was we need positive change. Burning our own country down is definitely change, but… well, I guess it’s what the (fucking traitorous) voters wanted, so… buckle up.

        • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          As a foreigner whos seen what the US does to other countries, the US burning down sounds pretty good, and being a traitor to the US something to be encouraged.

      • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Not good, still bad, just better than “holy shit why are we driving OFF of the cliff at full speed stop STOP! STOOOOOoooooop…”

        • MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Trump is driving off the cliff at 100 mph, Biden was driving off it at 90. “We’re technically better” – when part of that argument includes doing hypothetically less genocide – is a losing platform. You have to seriously promise major improvements.

          • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Yeah Ive used that same sentiment in this analogy a few other times before. The Dems became complacent using “at least were not them” as there entire fucking running strategy for too long. “Here are 1-2 token policy changes that are technically a step in the right direction, that will distract you from business as usual while never undoing any of the real problems with the country and making larger steps toward more problems”

            • MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Another part of the problem is that Obama promised fundamental changes, made only some minor improvements, then the party took a significant rightward turn (especially in foreign policy). His signature domestic policy achievement was so minor that healthcare was the biggest issue in the next two Democratic primaries. His two biggest foreign policy achievements (the nuclear deal with Iran, beginning to normalize relations with Cuba) were immediately undone by Trump, and Biden took no steps to revive them.

              He overpromised and way, way underdelivered, often with a notable lack of trying. You can’t sell people on incremental change if you build only small things the other guys can immediately break, and if you don’t even try that hard to do better.

    • Lad@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Nothing ever feels like it improves under centre-ground status quo politics. If things are miserable, they remain miserable.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Many ways, but a good way to start is joining an org near you, like PSL or FRSO, or even the DSA with the intention of joining with Red Star Caucus (all US based orgs). Unionizing can be great as well, as long as you combine it with reading theory (I have an Introductory Marxist Reading List if you want somewhere to start).

          Studying the history of worker organization and revolution helps teach us what we need to do, and can help guide us in analyzing how our conditions are similar and different to find a correct strategy.

          • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            You can’t organize the working class with a “Marxist” reading list, maga was already told they don’t like that word. Speak the ideology of unionization while avoiding the things that can be associated with Marxism, communism, socialism, while remembering they don’t understand those things, they just have a trigger words they know to hate.

            As an aside when speaking to maga, don’t let the conversation ever be Dem vs GOP, always frame is as workers vs elites. In the former we are divided, in the later we have solidarity.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              23 hours ago

              You can’t organize the working class with a “Marxist” reading list

              If you don’t read theory, you’re going to have a hard time with praxis.

              I just said dont say marxism or communism because a huge percent of the population are literal sheep who have already been told thats bad

              I tend to find that labeling things is a lot of wasted effort, but shrugging and owning the label other people give you is a powerful method of reclaiming the language.

              If you’re an affable, compassionate, well-organized, and appealing organizer, and someone comes around calling you a Far-Left Sicko Commie, then that’s actually pretty great for Far-Left Sicko Commies everywhere.

              The struggle I see, more often than not, is with individuals who come into an organization dogmatically adhering to a party line that lacks a party. The dogmatism in the name of Marxist Theory (or Anarchist Theory or Liberal Theory or whatever personal staunchly held belief you’ve decided to cling to) is what ends up wrecking an organization. Theories can only inform your actions, but at the end of the day you need to tackle your problems practically and make your case materially.

              People bickering over the ideological underpinnings of the Spanish Civil War, then spiraling into calling one another Tankies and Scratched Liberals and such… not terribly helpful in the long run.

              • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                23 hours ago

                I don’t understand how saying we should avoid labels and stick to ideologies is a bad thing. I just don’t see a route for people to organize working class folks under a banner when all the banners have already been tarnished for 60-70% of the people, it seems that route is a more uphill battle with no determinable advantage to just organizing under the idea that we the working class are being robbed endlessly by the elite ruling class and it has to change.

                As to your point about theory only going so far, yes I 100% agree. But i was speaking about our current state, specifically because this is the first time in recent history that division among left/right working class folks has ever traveled closer to each other, if only a little bit.

                Am i using the word ideology wrong maybe? Because it seems a few people are at issue with what im saying, while saying the same thing rephrased. There might be some sort of nuance to the word I’m missing. I mean ideology as purely just theory and reasoning on why a thing is or isn’t; in this circumstance as a stand-in for something loosely close to “We the people are no longer represented by government, and billionaires run the country”. Id worry if you expand it beyond that you lose a lot of support. But you obviously should go beyond that at some point, and you have to have a gameplan, but as mentioned before that feels like a conversation for down the road.

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  23 hours ago

                  I just don’t see a route for people to organize working class folks under a banner when all the banners have already been tarnished for 60-70% of the people

                  I don’t see the problem of banners being tarnished nearly so much as the Right Wing Wurlitzer media blinding and defeaning its audience at a scale no small community outreach organization can compete with. It’s less that anyone has an entrenched view of <insert ideology> as dirty and more that - at any moment - a talk radio host can unload a shotgun full of sloppy diarrhea in any direction.

                  we the working class are being robbed endlessly by the elite ruling class and it has to change

                  At some point, people do need to understand that they control the means of production in a very literal sense. Their hands are on the rudder and it is their collective effort that moves the ship. But building that class consciousness is hard. At some level, you aren’t trying to build a giant ideological social movement. What you’re trying to build is a network of people around you who like and trust one another.

                  That’s significantly more impervious to shotgun blasts of feces from a national media organ, because its no longer a contest between Army of Loud Mouths and Guy You’ve Never Heard Of.

                  Id worry if you expand it beyond that you lose a lot of support.

                  I think you have a large deficit of trust, generally speaking. There is no Perfect Messaging Strategy you can use to shape discourse. There is only the sheer volume of discourse blasted out over a wide audience. YouTube filling up with random right-wing hacks doesn’t happen because the hacks are incredibly good at their job. It entirely because the billionaire donor class is willing to spend enormous amounts of money to spew this message everywhere.

                  You, personally, can’t do anything about that. But you can build up a local group of friends and neighbors who like one another. Having a community around you who like and trust one another is the best defense against this kind of aimless hate. Sticking up for one another at every opportunity builds trust and confidence. Finding new opportunities to make new friends and expand your circle is all you can really do.

            • Grapho@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              What you’re saying is exactly the discourse COINTELPRO promoted in US organizations in the 60s and 70s (when they weren’t outright murdering the party members).

              How’d that one work out?

              It’s easy to deflect workers off the path of real, lasting change when even the organizers only try to do sloganeering instead of education.

              • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                24 hours ago

                I was trying to avoid the sloganeering you clearly hate by saying we should be avoiding labels and focusing on ideology, you know, the route of “real, lasting change”. But at least u got to feel smugly smarter than me for a brief moment after failing to understand what i said and arguing against something I didn’t say. Please stay out of this topic, you’re the exact kind of person that makes larger swathes of people not want to associate with them because they’d be associating with you too…

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              Historically, such a strategy doesn’t actually work. Sooner or later, you get accused of being a godless commie or a tankie anyways. You can either stand firm in your beliefs and attempt to sweep away the dirt of the Red Scare to accurately contextualize Socialism and AES states, or fail to support them at all, leading to issues like Trotskyism (poor understanding of theory and a lack of support for AES) or PatSocs (Nationalist Socialists in the Imperialist countries).

        • AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          You can start by height. If that doesn’t work you can try favorite ice cream flavor.

          And no, boot leather isn’t actually an ice cream flavor. There seems to have been some confusion about that amongst us workers lately.

            • AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              You’re right. Perhaps I need to touch grass. My “is this commenter worth actually expending energy” meter may be off.

              And to be clear, there was no jab at marxists. There was a jab at the lack of working class solidarity and wealth cult that exists within my everyday context in the US. Which you aren’t necessarily aware of.

              Marxist and Anarchist end goals really aren’t so different that it makes sense to foster any leftist infighting. We all ultimately want things to be better for everyone, especially the working class.

              • frostysauce@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                24 hours ago

                Nah, the person you replied to needs to touch grass. They’re taking the comments on a meme post way too seriously.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                Ah, gotcha! I’ve seen way too many people making jabs at Marxists these days so I got defensive. I apologize, I got ahead of myself. I agree entirely that at this stage it makes no sense whatsoever to engage in hostile relations between Anarchists and Marxists, the goal remains a more equitable society and liberation of the working class, and are more useful to each other than non-useful.